Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

12:30
Testing Visual Sensitivity to the Speed and Direction of Motion in Lizards
Published on: December 14, 2006
11.5K
Resource manipulation reveals interactive phenotype-dependent foraging in free-ranging lizards.
Orr Spiegel1, Marcus Michelangeli2,3,4, David L Sinn5
1School of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
The Journal of Animal Ecology
|June 15, 2024
Summary
Individual differences in behavioral types (BTs) like boldness and aggressiveness significantly impact foraging success in sleepy lizards. Bold and aggressive lizards were most successful, showing complex interactions in foraging strategies.
Area of Science:
- Animal behavior
- Ecology
- Evolutionary biology
Background:
- Individual variation in foraging tactics is linked to behavioral types (BTs).
- Few studies examine BT effects across multiple foraging stages in natural settings.
- Sleepy lizards (Tiliqua rugosa) exhibit consistent boldness and aggressiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate how boldness and aggressiveness interact to influence foraging processes in wild sleepy lizards.
- Determine if BTs affect search and handling components of foraging.
- Understand the implications of BT-dependent foraging for individual fitness and population dynamics.
Main Methods:
- Supplemented 123 food patches with varying food abundance (high, low, control).
- Quantified feeding behavior using camera traps and tracked lizard movements with GPS.
- Assayed individual boldness and aggressiveness repeatedly.
Main Results:
- An interactive effect of boldness and aggressiveness on foraging performance was observed.
- Bold and aggressive lizards consumed the most food items.
- Aggressive lizards visited patches less regularly and showed less patch quality discrimination.
- Bolder lizards visited patches more regularly and consumed a higher proportion of available food.
Conclusions:
- Behavioral types interact to influence distinct search and handling aspects of foraging.
- BTs contribute to within-population variation in foraging success.
- Individual differences in foraging, influenced by BTs, can shape fitness strategies and population dynamics.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
16.2K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
16.2K
Types of Selection
40.4K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
40.4K
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
6.5K
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
6.5K

