Prevention of peritoneal adhesions after gynecological surgery: a systematic review

Sebastian D Schaefer1, Ibrahim Alkatout2, Nadja Dornhoefer3

  • 1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clemenshospital Muenster, Münster, Germany. seb.schaefer@alexianer.de.

Insights

Adhesion barriers can reduce post-gynecological surgery adhesions, with hyaluronic acid and modified starch showing significant promise. Further research should standardize scoring and focus on patient outcomes like pain and infertility.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Post-gynecological surgery adhesions cause pain, infertility, and obstruction.
  • Adhesions represent a significant economic burden on healthcare systems globally.

Approach:

  • Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating adhesion barriers in gynecological surgery.
  • Included RCTs with second-look surgery to assess adhesion formation in the pelvic/abdominal cavity.

Key Points:

  • 45 RCTs involving 4,120 patients examined 10 unique barrier types.
  • Hyaluronic acid, modified starch, and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene demonstrated notable adhesion reduction.
  • 4DryField® showed the greatest improvement in adhesion scores (85%).

Conclusions:

  • While findings are inconsistent across barrier types, hyaluronic acid, modified starch, and Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane show potential.
  • Nonabsorbable barriers like Gore-Tex may increase risks; 4DryField® offers the highest efficacy.
  • Future studies need standardized scores and patient-reported outcomes (pain, infertility) for better comparability.
Abstract