Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

A Simple Cell-based Immunofluorescence Assay to Detect Autoantibody Against the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate NMDA Receptor in Blood
Published on: January 9, 2018
Head-to-head comparison of four plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) immunoassays
Susan Ashrafzadeh-Kian1, Daniel Figdore1, Bethany Larson1
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Background:
Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) is an emerging blood biomarker of neuro-axonal injury and neurodegeneration with the potential to be used in the clinical management of various neurological conditions. Various NfL immunoassays are in development on high-throughput automated systems, but little information is available related to the comparability between assays. In this study, we performed a head-to-head comparison of four NfL immunoassays using plasma samples from individuals with various neurological conditions.
Methods:
EDTA plasma samples in which NfL was ordered clinically were stratified according to diagnosis. NfL concentrations (pg/mL) in plasma were obtained using the Quanterix Simoa®, the Roche Elecsys, the Siemens Healthineers Atellica®IM, and the Fujirebio Lumipulse® NfL assays. Passing-Bablok regression analyses were performed to assess the correlation and bias between methods. Additionally, the distribution of NfL concentrations for each assay was assessed in three disease groups: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) upon initial diagnosis, ALS treated, and multiple sclerosis (MS).
Results:
The R2 between assays were all ≥ 0.95, however, significant proportional bias was observed between some assays. In particular, the Roche Elecsys assay NfL concentrations were significantly lower (∼85 %) when compared against the other three assays. The four assays were comparable with regards to the percentage of patients that were identified as having an elevated NfL result in the various clinical groups: ALS initial diagnoses (83-94 %), ALS untreated (93-100 %), and MS (8-18 %).
Conclusions:
This is the first study describing a head-to-head comparison of four automated NfL immunoassays. We demonstrate that there is a strong correlation between assays but a lack of standardization which is evident by the bias observed between some of the evaluated methods. These analytical differences will be important to consider when using NfL as a biomarker of neurodegeneration.
More Related Videos
11:03Use of Capillary Electrophoresis Immunoassay to Search for Potential Biomarkers of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Human Platelets
Published on: February 10, 2020
10:19High-throughput Flow Cytometry Cell-based Assay to Detect Antibodies to N-Methyl-D-aspartate Receptor or Dopamine-2 Receptor in Human Serum
Published on: November 23, 2013