Thyroid Nodules: Past, Present, and Future

Over the past millennia, the evaluation and management of thyroid nodules has essentially remained the same with thyroidectomy as the only reliable method to identify malignancy. However, in the last 30 years, technological advances have significantly improved diagnostic management of thyroid nodules. Advances in imaging have allowed development of a reliable risk- based stratification system to identify nodules at increased risk of malignancy. At the same time, sensitive imaging has caused collateral damage to the degree that we are now identifying and treating many small, low risk nodules with little to no clinical relevance.

To review the history of thyroid nodule evaluation with emphasis on recent changes and future pathways.

Literature review and discussion.

Thyroid ultrasound remains the best initial method to evaluate the thyroid gland for nodules. Different risk-of-malignancy protocols have been developed and introduced by different societies, reporting methods have been developed and improved each, with goals of improving the ability to recognize nodules requiring further intervention and minimizing excessive monitoring of those who do not. Once identified, cytological evaluation of nodules further enhances malignancy identification with molecular markers assisting in ruling out malignancies in indeterminate nodules preventing unneeded intervention. And all societies have urged avoidance of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of low-risk cancers of little to no clinical relevance.

In this review, we describe advancements in nodule evaluation and management, while emphasizing caution in overdiagnosing and overtreating low-risk lesions without clinical importance.