Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
Constraints and Statical Determinacy01:26

Constraints and Statical Determinacy

601
In structural engineering, the equilibrium of a system is not only determined by its equations of equilibrium but also with the help of constraints. Constraints refer to restrictions on the motion of a system. The proper combinations of constraints can minimize the total number of constraints needed to maintain a system in mechanical equilibrium. When this happens, the system is said to be statically determinate. For such systems, the unknown reaction supports can be estimated using equilibrium...
601
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity01:15

Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity

263
Deformation occurs in axial and transverse directions when an axial load is applied to a slender bar. This deformation impacts the cubic element within the bar, transforming it into either a rectangular parallelepiped or a rhombus, contingent on its orientation. This transformation process induces shearing strain. Axial loading elicits both shearing and normal strains. Applying an axial load instigates equal normal and shearing stresses on elements oriented at a 45° angle to the load axis.
263
Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving01:16

Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving

376
Statically indeterminate problems are those where statics alone can not determine the internal forces or reactions. Consider a structure comprising two cylindrical rods made of steel and brass. These rods are joined at point B and restrained by rigid supports at points A and C. Now, the reactions at points A and C and the deflection at point B are to be determined. This rod structure is classified as statically indeterminate as the structure has more supports than are necessary for maintaining...
376
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

106
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
106

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nonlinear Science Leaps Forward … Again.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025
Same author

Catastrophe Modelling for Time Series of Reported Cases of COVID-19: Workload Effects in the Health Care System.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025
Same author

Understanding the Role of Autonomic Synchrony in the Swallowtail Catastrophe Model of Leadership Emergence.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025
Same author

Explaining heterogeneity: Latent profiles of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Applied neuropsychology. Adult·2025
Same author

Cusp Catastrophe Models and the Role of Synchrony in Cognitive Workload and Fatigue in Teams.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025
Same author

Introduction to Emergence in Social Systems.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

20.8K

Who Syncs? Elasticity-Rigidity in Dynamic Decision Teams.

Stephen J Guastello1, Owen Hombsch1, Madelyn Schaid1

  • 1Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI.

Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences
|June 16, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study explored how psychological traits influence team synchrony in dynamic decision-making games. Key factors like coping flexibility and emotional intelligence predicted empathic connection within teams, but not individual influence.

More Related Videos

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

13.6K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

20.8K
An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

13.6K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Team Dynamics

Background:

  • Autonomic synchrony is crucial for team performance, especially in tasks requiring coordinated actions.
  • Elasticity-rigidity variables, related to adaptability, influence individual synchronization within teams.
  • The driver-empath model quantifies group synchrony (SE) and individual influence (driver) and receptivity (empath) scores.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between nine elasticity-rigidity psychological variables and autonomic synchrony in teams.
  • To identify which psychological variables predict individual empath scores within a team context.
  • To explore the connection between elasticity-rigidity variables and driver scores in group synchrony.

Main Methods:

  • Examined teams playing a dynamic decision-making computer game.
  • Utilized the driver-empath model to generate synchrony (SE), driver, and empath scores.
  • Correlated nine elasticity-rigidity variables with driver and empath scores at different session stages.

Main Results:

  • Coping flexibility, monitoring, emotional intelligence, and anagram solving predicted empath scores early in the session.
  • Anxiety and monitoring significantly predicted empath scores later in the session.
  • No significant correlations were found between driver scores and elasticity-rigidity variables.

Conclusions:

  • Certain psychological traits, particularly those related to flexibility and emotional processing, are associated with a team member's receptivity to others.
  • Individual influence (driver scores) within teams was not significantly linked to the measured elasticity-rigidity variables.
  • Findings suggest that adaptability and emotional intelligence are key predictors of empathic synchrony in dynamic team environments.