Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Assurance methods for designing a clinical trial with a delayed treatment effect
James A Salsbury1, Jeremy E Oakley1, Steven A Julious2
1The School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Assurance calculations, a Bayesian approach, help plan clinical trials by setting sample sizes. This study introduces a new method for immuno-oncology trials with delayed treatment effects, improving success rates.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Design
- Immuno-oncology
Background:
- Assurance calculations offer a Bayesian alternative to traditional power calculations for clinical trial planning.
- Immuno-oncology drug development often features delayed treatment effects, where survival curves diverge later.
- Ignoring parameter uncertainty in assurance calculations can lead to insufficient sample sizes and increased trial failure risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a novel elicitation technique for estimating parameters in trials with delayed treatment effects.
- To demonstrate how to compute assurance using elicited prior distributions.
- To improve the success rate and efficiency of Phase III immuno-oncology trials.
Main Methods:
- Developed a new elicitation technique for delayed treatment effects.
- Computed assurance using elicited prior distributions.
- Illustrated the methodology with a practical example and developed open-source software.
Main Results:
- The proposed method accounts for parameter uncertainty crucial for delayed treatment effects.
- Demonstrated practical application and provided open-source software for assurance calculation.
- The methodology can enhance statistical power and reduce failure risk in relevant trials.
Conclusions:
- The new assurance calculation methodology is suitable for immuno-oncology trials with delayed treatment effects.
- This approach helps ensure adequate sample sizes and increases the likelihood of detecting clinically relevant treatment effects.
- The methods have the potential to optimize Phase III trial efficiency and success rates.
Related Concept Videos
Blinding
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Blind Procedures
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

