Related Experiment Video For Contrast-enhanced ultrasound
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

In Vivo, Percutaneous, Needle Based, Optical Coherence Tomography of Renal Masses
Published on: March 30, 2015
Qualitative and quantitative assessment of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma using contrast-enhanced ultrasound
WeiPing Zhang1, JingLing Wang2, Li Chen2
1Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China. ndyfy02237@ncu.edu.cn.
Background:
Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) represents a rare form of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the clinic. It is now understood that contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) exhibits diverse manifestations and can be prone to misdiagnosis. Therefore, summarizing the distinctive features of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is essential for differentiation from ccRCC.
Objective:
This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of qualitative and quantitative CEUS in diagnosing nccRCC to enhance our understanding of this condition.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 21 patients with confirmed nccRCC following surgery and assessed the characteristic conventional ultrasound and CEUS imaging features. The paired Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was employed to compare differences in CEUS time-intensity curve (TIC) parameters between the lesions and the normal renal cortex.
Results:
Routine ultrasound revealed the following primary characteristics in the 21 nccRCC cases: hypoechoic appearance (10/21, 47.6%), absence of liquefaction (18/21, 66.7%), regular shape (19/21, 90.5%), clear boundaries (21/21, 100%), and absence of calcification (17/21, 81%). Color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) indicated a low blood flow signal (only 1 case of grade III). Qualitative CEUS analysis demonstrated that nccRCC predominantly exhibited slow progression (76.1%), fast washout (57%), uniformity (61.9%), low enhancement (71.5%), and ring enhancement (61.9%). Quantitative CEUS analysis revealed that parameters such as PE, WiAUC, mTTI, WiR, WiPI, WoAUC, WiWoAUC, and WOR in the lesions were significantly lower than those in the normal renal cortex (Z=-3.980, -3.563, -2.427, -3.389, -3.980, -3.493, -3.528, -2.763, P < 0.001, < 0.001, = 0.015, = 0.001, < 0.001, < 0.001, < 0.001, = 0.006). However, there were no significant differences in RT, TTP, FT, or QOF (all P > 0.05).
Conclusion:
nccRCC exhibits distinctive CEUS characteristics, including slow progression, fast washout, low homogeneity enhancement, and ring enhancement, which can aid in distinguishing nccRCC from ccRCC.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):

