Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
The Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Oswestry Disability Index Substantially Varies Based on
Matthew J Solomito1, Cameron Kia1,2, Heeren Makanji1,2
1Hartford HealthCare Bone and Joint Institute, Hartford, CT.
Study Design:
Retrospective study.
Objective:
Evaluate differences in the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold value based on various acceptable statistical methods and how these differences may influence the interpretation of surgical benefit following elective 1- and 2-level lumbar fusion.
Summary Of Background Data:
The MCID is a statistically determined threshold value to evaluate if a patient has received benefit from a medical procedure. In the era of value-based medicine, the MCID has become increasingly important. However, there is substantial ambiguity surrounding the interpretation of this value, given that it can be influenced by both demographic and methodological factors.
Methods:
A total of 371 patients who underwent 1- or 2-level elective lumbar fusions between June 2021 and June 2023 were included in this study. All patients completed both their preoperative and 6-month postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), as well as 2 anchor questions concerning satisfaction with their surgical procedure. The MCID values were calculated using 16 accepted statistical methods, and the resulting MCID values were applied to the cohort to determine how many patients reached MCID by 6 months postfusion.
Results:
Results demonstrated significant variability in the MCID value. The average MCID value for all 16 methods was 10.5±7.0 points in the in the range (0.8 to 25). Distribution methods provided lower threshold MCID values but had greater variability while the Anchor methods resulted in higher threshold values but had lower variability. Depending on the method used 30% to 83% of the cohort reached MCID by 6 months.
Conclusion:
The statistical method used to calculate the MCID resulted in significantly different threshold values and greatly affected the number of patients meeting MCID. The results demonstrates the complexity surrounding the interpretation of MCID values and calls into question the utility of a single statistically determined value to assess surgical success.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Regression Toward the Mean
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...

