Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children
Published on: September 11, 2018
Routine Emergency Department Screening to Decrease Subsequent Physical Abuse
Daniel M Lindberg1, Ryan A Peterson2, Rebecca Orsi-Hunt3
1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO; The Kempe Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Child Abuse and Neglect, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
Insights
Routine emergency department (ED) screening for child physical abuse did not significantly impact referrals to child protective services (CPS). This study found no change in abuse identification rates after implementing screening protocols.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Child Abuse and Neglect
- Public Health Policy
Background:
- Emergency department (ED) screening for child physical abuse is common.
- The effectiveness of ED screening in identifying child abuse remains uncertain.
- Understanding screening impact on child protective services (CPS) referrals is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of routine ED screening on referrals to CPS for child abuse.
- To determine if screening influences the identification of child abuse in young children.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of children under 6 years old across two healthcare systems.
- One system implemented routine child abuse screening; the other served as a control.
- Linked records were used to compare initial (<2 days) and subsequent (3-180 days) CPS referrals identifying abuse before and after screening implementation.
Main Results:
- A total of 331,120 ED encounters were analyzed; 12.6% occurred during the screening period.
- ED screening did not significantly alter initial or subsequent CPS referrals for child abuse.
- Adjusted odds ratios showed no statistically significant difference in referral rates compared to pre-screening periods or non-screening EDs.
Conclusions:
- Routine ED screening for child physical abuse did not demonstrate an impact on CPS referrals.
- The study suggests current screening protocols may not enhance child abuse identification through CPS referrals.
Study Objective:
Emergency department (ED) screening for child physical abuse has been widely implemented, with uncertain effects on child abuse identification. Our goal was to determine the effect of screening on referrals to child protective services (CPS) identifying abuse.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective cohort study of children younger than 6 years old with an ED encounter at 1 of 2 large health care systems, one of which implemented routine child abuse screening. The main outcome was initial (<2 days) or subsequent (3 to 180 days) referral to CPS identifying child abuse using linked records. We compared outcomes for the 2-year period after screening was implemented to the preperiod and nonscreening EDs using generalized estimating equations to adjust for sex, age, race/ethnicity, payor and prior ED encounters and clustered by center.
Results:
Of the 331,120 ED encounters, 41,589 (12.6%) occurred at screening EDs during the screening period. Screening was completed in 34,272 (82%) and was positive in 188 (0.45%). Overall, 7,623 encounters (2.3%) had a subsequent referral, of which 589 (0.2%) identified moderate or severe abuse. ED screening did not change initial (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89 to 1.15) or subsequent referral to CPS when compared to the prescreening period (aOR=1.05, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.18) or to the nonscreening EDs (aOR=1.06, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.21).
Conclusion:
Routine screening did not affect initial or subsequent referrals to CPS.
More Related Videos
06:45Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Screening for Proximal Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
Published on: February 10, 2023
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...