A Broad-Scale Look at Nutrient Limitation and a Shift toward Co-limitation in United States Lakes

There is a longstanding debate about the role of nitrogen (N) vs phosphorus (P) in limiting primary production in lakes and whether co-nutrient limitation should be considered for managing eutrophication. We evaluated nutrient limitation and eutrophication at a subcontinental scale. Using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Lakes Assessment data, we assessed broad-scale patterns in nutrient limitation and compared samples of all surveyed lakes and lakes resurveyed in multiple surveys. We found that N correlated more strongly with productivity in the western U.S., while P correlated more strongly in the eastern U.S. The aggregated subcontinental effect suggests the importance of factors like N-deposition, terrestrial vegetation, underlying geology, and land use for understanding drivers of nutrient dynamics in lakes. Our study showed how patterns can aggregate across subcontinental scales yet still demonstrate considerable variation when more deeply examined on an individual lake level. Overall, we found that nutrient limitation is dynamic over space and time, with most lakes being co-limited. The prevalence of co-limitation also increased from 2007 to 2017. Trophic states within each limitation category varied substantially. Our findings underscore the need for combined N and P reductions to mitigate accelerated eutrophication.