Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Measuring Light-Switching Behavior Using an Occupancy and Light Data Logger
Published on: January 16, 2020
(Mis)matched direct and moderating relationships among pro-environmental attitudes, environmental efficacy, and
Lindsay B Miller1, Ronald E Rice1
1Department of Communication, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Abstract:
Pro-environmental behaviors are influenced by individuals' pro-environmental attitudes and environmental efficacy, among many other factors. However, attitude-behavior models are inconsistent on whether and how attitudes, efficacy, and behaviors should match in specificity or generality, and on the moderation effect of efficacy. This study first tests a simple model including direct and moderating relationships between pro-environmental attitudes, environmental efficacy, and pro-environmental behaviors. Then it examines relationships among subscales matched or mismatched in their respective specific or general domain of environmental attitudes (concern, values), environmental efficacy (self, collective), and pro-environmental behaviors (private, public). Secondary data come from an overall sample of 11,000 respondents across 11 countries, with n = 1,000 from each country. Pro-environmental attitudes and efficacy have direct relationships with pro-environmental behavior, but efficacy has little moderation effect. Different combinations of (mis)matched measures produce slightly different results, with the most variance explained, counter to hypotheses, by two mismatched models. Results are generally consistent across countries.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Social Proof
Fundamental Attribution Error
Attitudes
Cause and Effect
Environmental Influences on Intelligence

