Reasons for Discordance between 68Ga-PSMA-PET and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Jade Wang1, Elisabeth O'Dwyer2, Juana Martinez Zuloaga2

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10065, USA.

Cancers
|June 19, 2024
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Whole-body MRI misses prostate cancer metastases, but reviewing false negatives against PSMA PET reveals missed lesions. Improving MRI interpretation and reader training can enhance accuracy for detecting cancer spread.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Prostate cancer (PCa) metastases assessment relies on PSMA PET, the gold standard, but its availability is limited.
  • Whole-body MRI is more accessible but less sensitive in detecting metastatic lesions compared to PSMA PET.
  • This study addresses the underutilization of whole-body MRI by analyzing discrepancies with PSMA PET to improve its diagnostic performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To enhance the interpretation of whole-body MRI for prostate cancer metastases by retrospectively comparing false-negative MRI scans with PSMA PET findings.
  • To identify specific MRI features that were initially overlooked in cases of missed metastatic disease.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective sub-analysis of a prospectively collected database of patients from a PSMA PET/MRI clinical trial (2018-2021).
  • Inclusion criteria: patients with discrepancies between PSMA PET and whole-body MRI reports, identified as "false negative" MRI cases.
  • Review of selected cases by the original attending radiologist to identify initially missed MRI findings indicative of metastatic disease.

Main Results:

  • 38 (14%) of 263 cases met inclusion criteria for review.
  • Six classes of MRI false negatives were identified: anatomically normal (47%), atypical appearance (16%), mischaracterization (3%), undercall (16%), obscured (11%), and no abnormality (8%).
  • Nearly 50% of false negatives were anatomically normal on MRI, and 32% involved interpretive errors, suggesting limitations in current criteria and training.

Conclusions:

  • Current anatomic criteria for evaluating prostate cancer lymph node metastases on MRI are suboptimal, necessitating improved diagnostic standards.
  • Enhancing reader training in interpreting whole-body MRI can significantly reduce interpretive errors and improve detection rates.
  • Despite limitations, optimizing MRI interpretation could reduce the number of cases with disease outside conventional treatment plans.