Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Functional Classification of Joints01:09

Functional Classification of Joints

4.0K
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses  or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
4.0K
Movement Joints in Buildings01:27

Movement Joints in Buildings

114
Movement joints in buildings are essential design elements that accommodate inevitable motions caused by various factors such as temperature changes, moisture content variations, and structural deflections. These motions, if not considered in design and construction, can lead to unsightly or dangerous damage. Movement joints are incorporated in different forms to manage these stresses and allow materials to move without causing distress.
The simplest type of movement joints, working joints, are...
114
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

458
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
458
Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion01:24

Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion

219
Visualize a drone, with its propellers spinning rapidly, hovering mid-air. The fascinating movements and operations of this drone can be comprehended by applying the principle of general plane motion.
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the...
219
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

399
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
399
Kinematic Equations for Rotation01:30

Kinematic Equations for Rotation

320
In mechanics, when one observes a rigid body in rotational motion with constant angular acceleration, it is possible to establish equations for its rotational kinematics. This process resembles how linear kinematics are dealt with in simpler motion studies.
For instance, imagine a point A on a rigid body engaged in circular motion. The translational velocity of this particular point can be calculated by taking the time derivatives of the displacement equation, which essentially measures the...
320

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dataset for rapid estimation of femoral neck loading during gait and dynamic exercises.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Escalating to Weekly Adalimumab Dosing for the Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitis: A Multicenter Study.

Ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Pars plana vitrectomy with tissue plasminogen activator for traumatic submacular hemorrhage.

International journal of ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Sensor Fusion for Enhancing Motion Capture: Integrating Optical and Inertial Motion Capture Systems.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

A fatigue failure framework for the assessment of highly variable low back loading using inertial motion capture - a case study.

Ergonomics·2025
Same author

A Hierarchical-Based Learning Approach for Multi-Action Intent Recognition.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2025

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
06:52

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field

Published on: May 26, 2020

7.9K

The Effect of Sensor Feature Inputs on Joint Angle Prediction across Simple Movements.

David Hollinger1, Mark C Schall2, Howard Chen3

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|June 19, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Adding more inertial measurement units (IMUs) or placing them on non-adjacent body parts did not improve human movement intent prediction (HMIP) accuracy. Sensor quantity and placement have minimal impact on predicting joint angles using machine learning.

Keywords:
accelerometersgyroscopesmovement intent predictionwearable sensors

More Related Videos

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

12.6K
An Objective and Child-friendly Assessment of Arm Function by Using a 3-D Sensor
07:25

An Objective and Child-friendly Assessment of Arm Function by Using a 3-D Sensor

Published on: February 12, 2018

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2025

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
06:52

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field

Published on: May 26, 2020

7.9K
MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

12.6K
An Objective and Child-friendly Assessment of Arm Function by Using a 3-D Sensor
07:25

An Objective and Child-friendly Assessment of Arm Function by Using a 3-D Sensor

Published on: February 12, 2018

6.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Wearable Technology
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare

Background:

  • Wearable sensors like inertial measurement units (IMUs) are increasingly used with machine learning for human intent recognition in health.
  • Limited research exists on how the number and placement of IMUs influence human movement intent prediction (HMIP) at the joint level.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the impact of IMU quantity and placement on the accuracy of predicting joint angles for simple human movements.
  • To determine optimal sensor configurations for maximizing machine learning prediction accuracy in HMIP.

Main Methods:

  • Trained a Random Forest algorithm to predict future joint angles using various combinations of IMU input signals.
  • Evaluated prediction accuracy (RMSE) for ankle, knee, and hip joints under different IMU configurations (adjacent vs. non-adjacent placements).

Main Results:

  • Adding adjacent IMUs did not significantly improve joint angle prediction accuracy (e.g., ankle RMSE 1.92° vs. 3.32°).
  • Including non-adjacent IMUs also failed to enhance prediction accuracy (e.g., ankle RMSE 5.35° vs. 5.55°).
  • The quantity and placement of IMUs showed minimal impact on predicting future joint angles during simple movements.

Conclusions:

  • The addition of IMUs, whether adjacent or non-adjacent, does not substantially improve the accuracy of predicting future joint angles.
  • Current joint angle inputs are sufficient for predicting simple movements, and additional IMUs offer limited predictive benefit.