Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

JADE-Plus: A Multimodal Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Large Language Framework for Diagnostic Support in Jawbone Lesions: Development and Technical Validation Study.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same author

Policy Considerations for National Virtual Hospitals: Global Evidence and the Seha Virtual Hospital Model.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Three-Dimensional Globe Repositioning Following Orbital Reconstruction Independent of Bony Landmarks and Fracture Pattern Associations.

Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction·2026
Same author

Analysis of the generalizability of an artificial intelligence-based software for tomographic segmentation of posterior teeth-an external validation study.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2026
Same author

Comparative Analysis of Artifact Expression in Zirconia and Graphene Crowns in CBCT Images From Different Systems.

International journal of dentistry·2026
Same author

Augmented and virtual reality in dental and oral and maxillofacial surgery education: a systematic review with a taxonomy of training technologies.

BMC medical education·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
10:23

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

2.7K

Can artificial intelligence-driven cephalometric analysis replace manual tracing? A systematic review and

Julie Hendrickx1, Rellyca Sola Gracea2,3,4, Michiel Vanheers1

  • 1Department of Oral Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.

European Journal of Orthodontics
|June 19, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise for accurate and efficient cephalometric landmark detection on 2D cephalograms and 3D CBCT images. While 2D analysis met accuracy thresholds, 3D analysis requires further research due to heterogeneity.

Keywords:
anatomic landmarksartificial intelligencecephalometryorthodontics

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

823
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
10:23

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

2.7K
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

823
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Radiology and Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • Dental Diagnostics

Background:

  • Cephalometric analysis is crucial for diagnosing and planning orthodontic and surgical treatments.
  • Traditional manual landmark identification is time-consuming and prone to inter-observer variability.
  • Automated landmark detection using artificial intelligence (AI) offers a potential solution to improve efficiency and accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and meta-analyze the accuracy and efficiency of AI-driven automated landmark detection.
  • To evaluate AI performance on both 2D lateral cephalograms and 3D cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images.
  • To identify the current state and limitations of AI in cephalometric analysis.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive electronic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and grey literature up to January 2024.
  • Studies utilizing AI for 2D or 3D cephalometric landmark detection were included.
  • Meta-analysis was performed for 2D landmark accuracy (mean radial error), while 3D accuracy was qualitatively synthesized due to heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed.

Main Results:

  • 34 publications were selected, with 27 focusing on 2D cephalograms and 7 on 3D CBCT images.
  • Meta-analysis of 2D images showed a mean error of 1.39 mm, below the 2 mm clinical threshold.
  • 3D landmark detection error ranged from 1.0 to 5.8 mm; meta-analysis was not feasible. Both 2D and 3D AI methods were time-efficient (<1 min).
  • A high risk of bias was noted in data selection and reference standards for most studies.

Conclusions:

  • AI-driven cephalometric landmark detection demonstrates potential for accuracy and time efficiency in both 2D and 3D imaging.
  • Further improvements in generalizability and robustness of AI systems are needed.
  • AI holds promise for revolutionizing cephalometric analysis, but methodological rigor and validation are essential.