Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

16:08
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
Published on: February 1, 2012
16.1K
The resolution of proactive interference in a novel visual working memory task: A behavioral and pupillometric study
Jamie Donenfeld1, Erik Blaser2, Zsuzsa Kaldy2
1Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 William T. Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA, 02125-3393, USA. jamie.donenfeld001@umb.edu.
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|June 19, 2024
Summary
Proactive interference impairs visual working memory, but resolving this interference did not consistently increase cognitive effort, as measured by pupil response. This suggests implicit processing may not trigger a significant pupillary response during memory retrieval.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Proactive interference (PI) hinders memory recall when prior information interferes with new learning.
- While studied in verbal memory, PI's impact on visual working memory (VWM) is less understood.
- Pupil diameter, an indicator of cognitive effort, has been linked to PI resolution in verbal tasks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the behavioral and pupillary correlates of PI resolution in VWM using a naturalistic paradigm.
- To assess the effect of PI on item-location bindings in VWM.
- To determine if PI resolution during memory retrieval is associated with increased cognitive effort.
Main Methods:
- Employed a novel, naturalistic paradigm with mixed PI and no-PI conditions.
- Assessed behavioral performance in VWM for item-location bindings.
- Measured pupil diameter as a neurophysiological index of cognitive effort during memory retrieval.
Main Results:
- Confirmed a detrimental effect of PI on VWM performance, even with spatially distributed stimuli.
- Found no consistent association between PI resolution and increased cognitive effort during memory retrieval.
- Pupil response reliably indicated higher effort during memory encoding for higher-performing individuals.
Conclusions:
- PI significantly impairs VWM, highlighting its impact beyond verbal memory.
- Cognitive effort, indexed by pupil response, is not consistently linked to PI resolution in VWM under conditions minimizing explicit strategies.
- Implicit processing during PI resolution may not elicit a detectable pupillometric response.

