Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2026

An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model
Published on: May 31, 2017
Does Screw Number of Zero-profile Implants in Fusion Segment Influence Intervertebral Stability?
Zihan Peng1, Yuxiao Deng1, Xiaqing Sheng1
1Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zero-profile implants with two or four screws offer similar spinal fusion outcomes. However, two-screw implants show increased subsidence, making four-screw options preferable for high-risk patients.
Area of Science:
- Spine surgery
- Orthopedic implants
- Fusion techniques
Background:
- Zero-profile implants are used in hybrid surgery for spinal fusion.
- The choice between two-screw and four-screw zero-profile implants is unclear due to limited comparative data.
- Patient-specific implant selection is crucial for optimal outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the postoperative subsidence, motion stabilization, and clinical outcomes of two-screw versus four-screw zero-profile implants in hybrid spinal fusion.
- To provide evidence-based recommendations for selecting the most appropriate implant in fusion surgery.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 173 patients undergoing hybrid surgery between February 2014 and March 2022.
- Patients were divided into two groups: 122 receiving a four-screw implant and 51 receiving a two-screw implant.
- Statistical analysis included the Wilcoxon rank sum test, t-tests/ANOVA, and stepwise multivariate logistic regression to assess patient-specific, radiographic, and clinical factors.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were found in immediate, middle, or long-term stability and fusion rates between the two and four-screw groups (p > 0.05).
- The two-screw group exhibited significantly higher FSU height subsidence at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.05).
- Both groups demonstrated significant clinical improvements at the final follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Two-screw and four-screw zero-profile implants yield comparable spinal stability, fusion rates, and clinical outcomes.
- The two-screw implant is associated with inferior subsidence prevention compared to the four-screw implant.
- While the two-screw implant is a viable option for most patients due to ease of use, the four-screw implant is recommended for individuals at high risk of subsidence.
More Related Videos
05:37Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
Published on: August 6, 2019
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
General Structure of a Vertebra
Articulations of the Vertebral Column
Torsion of Noncircular Members
Deformations in a Transverse Cross Section
As the material stretches, it expands or contracts in orthogonal directions to the load. This phenomenon varies...
Bending of Members Made of Several Materials
Hooke's Law determines stress in each material, stating that stress is proportional to strain but varies due to each material's...
Stability of structures