Closed-loop transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for the improvement of upper extremity motor function in...

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has garnered attention for stroke rehabilitation, with studies demonstrating its benefits when combined with motor rehabilitative training or delivered before motor training. The necessity of concurrently applying taVNS with motor training for post-stroke motor rehabilitation remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the necessity and advantages of applying the taVNS concurrently with motor training by an electromyography (EMG)-triggered closed-loop system for post-stroke rehabilitation.

We propose a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial involving 150 stroke patients assigned to one of three groups: concurrent taVNS, sequential taVNS, or sham control condition. In the concurrent group, taVNS bursts will synchronize with upper extremity motor movements with EMG-triggered closed-loop system during the rehabilitative training, while in the sequential group, a taVNS session will precede the motor rehabilitative training. TaVNS intensity will be set below the pain threshold for both concurrent and sequential conditions and at zero for the control condition. The primary outcome measure is the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). Secondary measures include standard upper limb function assessments, as well as EMG and electrocardiogram (ECG) features.

Ethical approval has been granted by the Medical Ethics Committee, affiliated with Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University for Clinical Studies (2023-QX-012-01). This study has been registered on ClinicalTrials (NCT05943431). Signed informed consent will be obtained from all included participants. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant stakeholder conferences and meetings.

This study represents a pioneering effort in directly comparing the impact of concurrent taVNS with motor training to that of sequential taVNS with motor training on stroke rehabilitation. Secondly, the incorporation of an EMG-triggered closed-loop taVNS system has enabled the automation and individualization of both taVNS and diverse motor training tasks-a novel approach not explored in previous research. This technological advancement holds promise for delivering more precise and tailored training interventions for stroke patients. However, it is essential to acknowledge a limitation of this study, as it does not delve into examining the neural mechanisms underlying taVNS in the context of post-stroke rehabilitation.