Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025
Development of Compendium for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: April 12, 2024
Immune cell related signature predicts prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on single-cell and
Xian Wang1,2, Wei Peng1, Yali Zhao1
1Department of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Background:
It has been reported that tumor immune microenvironment performs a vital role in tumor progress. However, acting mechanism of immune cell related genes (IRGs) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is uncertain.
Methods:
TCGA-ESCC, GSE23400, GSE26886, GSE75241, and GSE196756 datasets were gained via public databases. First, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between ESCC and control samples from GSE23400, GSE26886, and GSE75241 were screened out by differential expression analysis, and overlapping DEGs were identified. Single-cell transcriptome data of GSE196756 were applied to explore immune cells that might be involved in regulation of ESCC. Then, weighted gene co-expression network analysis was applied to screen IRGs. Next, differentially expressed IRGs (DE-IRGs) were identified by overlapping IRGs and DEGs, and were incorporated into univariate Cox, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and multivariate Cox to acquire prognosis-related genes, and ESCC samples were grouped into high-/low-risk groups on the basis of median risk score. Finally, the role of prognosis model in immunotherapy was analyzed.
Results:
Totally 248 DEGs were yielded by overlapping 3,915 DEGs in GSE26886, 459 DEGs in GSE23400, and 1,641 DEGs in GSE75241. Single-cell analysis found that B cells, dendritic cells, monocytes, neutrophils, natural killer cells, and T cells were involved in ESCC development. Besides, MEred, MEblack, MEpink, MEblue and MEbrown modules were considered as key modules because of their highest correlations with immune cell subtypes. A total of 154 DE-IRGs were yielded by taking intersection of DEGs and genes in key modules. Moreover, CTSC, ALOX12, and RMND5B were identified as prognosis-related genes in ESCC. Obviously, Exclusion and TIDE scores were notably lower in high-risk group than in the other one, indicating that high-risk group was more responsive to immunotherapy.
Conclusions:
Through bioinformatic analysis, we identified a prognosis model consisting of IRGs (CTSC, ALOX12, and RMND5B) in ESCC, providing new ideas for studies related to treatment and prognosis of ESCC.
