Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Evaluation of a Novel Laser-assisted Coronary Anastomotic Connector - the Trinity Clip - in a Porcine Off-pump Bypass Model
Published on: November 24, 2014
Angiographic Findings and Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve
Jinlong Zhang1, Doyeon Hwang2, Seokhun Yang2
1Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Transvascular Implantation Devices, Hangzhou, China.
Insights
Angiographic findings poorly correlate with post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR). Post-PCI FFR, not angiographic measures, predicts target vessel failure, supporting its use as a quality metric.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- The relationship between angiographic results and functional assessment (FFR) after PCI is not fully understood.
- Residual functional disease burden after stenting impacts clinical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the association between angiographic parameters and post-PCI FFR.
- To evaluate the clinical relevance of residual functional disease burden after drug-eluting stent implantation.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study of 2147 patients from the International Post-PCI FFR registry.
- Patients were grouped by post-PCI FFR: residual ischemia (≤0.80), suboptimal (0.81-0.86), and optimal (>0.86).
- Primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) at 2 years.
Main Results:
- Angiographic parameters showed poor correlation with post-PCI FFR (r < 0.20).
- Post-PCI FFR, but not angiographic parameters, was associated with TVF.
- Residual ischemia group had significantly higher TVF rates compared to suboptimal and optimal groups.
Conclusions:
- Low association exists between angiographic findings and post-PCI FFR.
- Post-PCI FFR is a predictor of clinical events, unlike angiographic parameters alone.
- Post-PCI FFR should be considered a procedural quality metric.
Importance:
The associations between angiographic findings and post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) and their clinical relevance according to residual functional disease burden have not been thoroughly investigated.
Objectives:
To evaluate the association of angiographic and physiologic parameters according to residual functional disease burden after drug-eluting stent implantation.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This cohort study population was from the International Post-PCI FFR registry, which incorporated 4 registries from Korea, China, and Japan. Patients who underwent angiographically successful second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation and post-PCI FFR measurement were included in the analysis. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the residual disease burden (post-PCI FFR ≤0.80 [residual ischemia], 0.81-0.86 [suboptimal], and >0.86 [optimal]). The data were collected from August 23, 2018, to June 11, 2019, and the current analysis was performed from January 11, 2022, to October 7, 2023.
Exposures:
Angiographic parameters and post-PCI FFR.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 2 years.
Results:
In this cohort of 2147 patients, the mean (SD) age was 64.3 (10.0) years, and 1644 patients (76.6%) were men. Based on the post-PCI physiologic status, 269 patients (12.5%) had residual ischemia, 551 (25.7%) had suboptimal results, and 1327 (61.8%) had optimal results. Angiographic parameters had poor correlations with post-PCI FFR (r < 0.20). Post-PCI FFR was isolated from all angiographic parameters in the unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis. Post-PCI FFR was associated with the occurrence of TVF (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] per post-PCI FFR 0.01 increase, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.92-0.97]; P < .001), but angiographic parameters were not. The residual ischemia group had a significantly higher rate of TVF than the suboptimal group (AHR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.08-2.83]; P = .02) and the optimal group (AHR, 2.94 [95% CI, 1.82-4.73]; P < .001). The TVR in the residual ischemia group was predominantly associated with TVR in the nonstented segment (14 [53.8%]), unlike the other 2 groups (3 [10.0%] in the suboptimal group and 13 [30.2%] in the optimal group).
Conclusions And Relevance:
In this cohort study of the International Post-PCI FFR registry, a low degree of associations were observed between angiographic and physiologic parameters after PCI. Post-PCI FFR, unlike angiographic parameters, was associated with clinical events and the distribution of clinical events. The current study supports the use of post-PCI FFR as a procedural quality metric and further prospective study is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Flow
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

