Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

An Affordable HIV-1 Drug Resistance Monitoring Method for Resource Limited Settings
Published on: March 30, 2014
Uptake and Persistent Use of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Among Key Populations: Results From Ukraine's Scaled
Olga Vitruk1, Alyona P Ihnatiuk2, Anna P Kazanzhy2
1Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Insights
HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) persistence was low in Ukraine, particularly among men who have sex with men and sex workers. Further research is needed to understand barriers to PrEP use in key populations.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
- HIV Prevention
Background:
- Ukraine has established HIV prevention programs since 1999.
- Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) was introduced in Ukraine in 2017.
- Limited data exists on PrEP uptake and persistence in Ukraine.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate PrEP persistence among key populations in Ukraine.
- To identify factors influencing PrEP retention in HIV prevention efforts.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from 40 facilities in Ukraine (Oct 2020 - Feb 2022).
- Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to estimate PrEP retention and discontinuation.
- Stratification by sex, age, and key populations (KPs): men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs (PWID), sex workers (SW), and discordant couples/others (DC/other).
Main Results:
- 2033 clients initiated PrEP; majority were DC/other (51%), MSM (22%), PWID (22%), and SW (5%).
- Overall 3-month PrEP persistence was 52.3%, lowest among SW (25.9%) and MSM (46.7%).
- After age adjustment, discontinuation risk did not significantly differ by KP group, though female PWID had lower risk and male SW had higher risk.
Conclusions:
- Three-month PrEP persistence was low across key populations, with notable challenges for sex workers.
- Further investigation into barriers and facilitators of PrEP persistence among key populations is crucial.
Background:
Ukraine has implemented ambitious HIV-prevention programs since 1999 and began offering preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in 2017. Little is known about PrEP uptake and persistence in this setting.
Setting:
We analyzed data from 40 facilities providing PrEP in 11 oblasts (regions) of Ukraine between October 2020 and February 2022.
Methods:
We estimated the time between PrEP visits and conducted Kaplan-Meier analyses to estimate retention on PrEP stratified by sex, age, and key populations (KPs): men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs (PWID), sex workers (SW), discordant couples, and others vulnerable to HIV acquisition (DC/other). We used Cox regression to estimate the risk of PrEP discontinuation by KP group and sex, adjusting for age.
Results:
Overall, 2033 clients initiated PrEP across regions; the majority (51%) were DC/other, 22% were MSM, 22% were PWID, and 5% were SW. The overall 3-month persistence was 52.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49.9% to 54.8%) and was lowest among MSM (46.7%; 95% CI: 41.9% to 52.2%) and SW (25.9%; 95% CI: 18.2% to 36.9%) (P < 0.05 for differences by KP group). After adjusting for age, PrEP discontinuation was not statistically significantly different across groups, although female PWID tended to have the lowest discontinuation risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.59; 95% CI: 0.31 to 1.11) while male SW tended to have the highest risk (aHR 1.87, 95% CI: 0.57 to 6.11) compared with females in the DC/other group.
Conclusion:
Three-month PrEP persistence was low across KP groups, especially in SW. Further research examining the barriers and enablers of persistence by KPs is needed.
Related Concept Videos
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Desensitization and Tachyphylaxis

