Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026
Meso-Scale Particle Image Velocimetry Studies of Neurovascular Flows In Vitro
Published on: December 3, 2018
Quantitative 2-Dimensionsal Digital Subtraction Venography for Venous Interventions: Validation in Phantom and
Sarvesh Periyasamy1, Erick L Oberstar2, Joseph F Whitehead3
1Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Purpose:
To determine the feasibility of using a 2-dimensional quantitative digital subtraction venography (qDSV) technique that employs a temporally modulated contrast medium injection to quantify blood velocity in phantom, normal, and stenotic porcine iliac vein models.
Materials And Methods:
Blood velocity was calculated using qDSV following temporally modulated pulsed injections of iodinated contrast medium and compared with Doppler ultrasound (US) measurements (phantom, in-line sensor; in vivo, diagnostic linear probe). Phantom evaluation was performed in a compliant polyethylene tube phantom with simulated venous flow. In vivo evaluation of qDSV was performed in normal (n = 7) and stenotic (n = 3) iliac vein models. Stenoses were created using endovenous radiofrequency ablation, and blood velocities were determined at baseline, after stenosis, after venoplasty, and after stent placement.
Results:
In the phantom model, qDSV-calculated blood velocities (12-50 cm/s) had very strong correlations with US-measured velocities (13-51 cm/s) across a range of baseline blood velocities and injection protocols (slope, 1.01-1.13; R2 = 0.96-0.99). qDSV velocities were similar to US velocities regardless of injection method: (a) custom injector, (b) commercial injector, or (c) hand injection. In the normal in vivo model, qDSV-calculated velocities (5-18 cm/s) had strong correlation (slope, 1.22; R2 = 0.90) with US-measured velocities (3-20 cm/s). In the stenosis model, blood velocities at baseline, after stenosis, after venoplasty, and after stent placement were similar on qDSV and US at all time points.
Conclusions:
Venous blood velocity was accurately quantified in a venous phantom and in vivo porcine models using qDSV. Intraprocedural changes in porcine iliac vein blood velocity were quantified with qDSV after creation of a stenosis and subsequently treating it with venoplasty and stent placement.
