Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.9K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

11.6K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
11.6K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

10.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.9K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

677
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
677
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

226
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and...
226
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I

639
The Wald-Wolfowitz test, also known as the runs test, is a nonparametric statistical test used to assess the randomness of a sequence of two different types of elements (e.g., positive/negative values, successes/failures). It examines whether the order of the elements in a sequence is random or if there is a pattern or trend present. This nonparametric test applies to any ordered data despite the population and sample data distribution, even if a higher sample size is available.
The test works...
639

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Noise equals control.

Physical review. E·2025
Same author

Is stochastic thermodynamics the key to understanding the energy costs of computation?

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

Universal slow dynamics of chemical reaction networks.

Physical review. E·2024
Same author

Breakdown of random matrix universality in Markov models.

Physical review. E·2021
Same author

Renormalization of elastic quadrupoles in amorphous solids.

Physical review. E·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

543

Robustness of the random language model.

Fatemeh Lalegani1, Eric De Giuli1

  • 1Department of Physics, <a href="https://ror.org/05g13zd79">Toronto Metropolitan University</a>, Toronto, Canada M5B 2K3.

Physical Review. E
|June 22, 2024
PubMed
Summary

The random language model, an ensemble of stochastic context-free grammars, explains first-language acquisition as annealing. This model is robust to real-world learning complexities and aligns with child language development at 24 months.

Area of Science:

  • Computational Linguistics
  • Cognitive Science
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • The random language model (RLM) uses stochastic context-free grammars to analyze human and computer language syntax.
  • It proposes first-language acquisition is analogous to annealing in the space of possible languages.
  • The basic RLM suggests a continuous transition to grammatical syntax via spontaneous symmetry breaking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To scrutinize the robustness of the RLM against model extensions and alternative parameter space trajectories.
  • To investigate the impact of explicit symmetry breaking on the language acquisition model.
  • To explore alternative pathways to grammatical syntax by manipulating deep and surface linguistic structures.

Main Methods:

  • The study extends the original random language model by introducing explicit symmetry breaking.

More Related Videos

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

440
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

543
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

440
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.2K
  • It analyzes trajectories through the model's parameter space beyond the originally considered ones.
  • It compares model predictions with human data on syntax network clustering coefficients.

    • Main Results:

    • The RLM scenario remains robust even with explicit symmetry breaking, a key aspect of real-world learning.
    • Grammatical syntax can be achieved by modifying observable properties while keeping underlying structures constant.
    • In an idealized limit, the transition to grammatical syntax exhibits characteristics of a sharp thermodynamic transition.
    • Model predictions align with human language data, specifically the clustering coefficient of syntax networks, at approximately 24 months of child development.

    Conclusions:

    • The random language model provides a robust framework for understanding first-language acquisition.
    • The model's findings are consistent with linguistic theories of language development and recent machine learning advancements.
    • The transition to grammatical syntax in the model mirrors key developmental milestones in human infants.