Market Entry Agreements for Innovative Pharmaceuticals Subject to Indication Broadening: A Case Study for Pembrolizumab in The Netherlands
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Managed entry agreements for cancer drugs like pembrolizumab can improve access. This study analyzed its cost-effectiveness in the Netherlands, finding it varies by indication and confidential pricing.
Area Of Science
- Health economics
- Pharmaceutical policy
- Oncology
Background
- Managed entry agreements (MEAs), particularly financial-based ones, are common in Europe for innovative cancer drugs.
- These agreements balance patient access to novel treatments with payer financial risk management.
- This study examines a confidential price agreement for pembrolizumab in the Netherlands.
Purpose Of The Study
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab across multiple indications under a confidential pricing agreement.
- To evaluate the impact of expanding indications on the drug's cost-effectiveness.
- To determine the viability and desirability of the existing agreement.
Main Methods
- Developed partitioned survival models for five pembrolizumab indications.
- Utilized published trial data for survival and progression-free survival to create individual patient data.
- Extrapolated outcomes over 30 years using parametric models, incorporating quality of life and cost data from literature.
Main Results
- Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) ranged from €35,313 to €322,349 per QALY without discounts.
- Only one indication met the €80,000/€100,000 cost-effectiveness threshold initially.
- After applying a typical Dutch pharmaceutical discount, ICERs ranged from €20,881 to €252,934 per QALY, meeting the threshold in three of five indications.
Conclusions
- Pembrolizumab's cost-effectiveness is contingent on the specific confidential price agreement and indication.
- Reimbursing non-cost-effective care is possible if pricing is based on a single indication.
- Indication-based pricing could better align the value and cost of innovative drugs with expanding indications.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
The targeted cancer therapies, also known as “molecular targeted therapies,” take advantage of the molecular and genetic differences between the cancer cells and the normal cells. It needs a thorough understanding of the cancer cells to develop drugs that can target specific molecular aspects that drive the growth, progression, and spread of cancer cells without affecting the growth and survival of other normal cells in the body.
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
During the development of a new pharmaceutical, the manufacturer initially assigns a code name to the drug. Once approved, the drug receives a United States Adopted Name (USAN)—a generic, nonproprietary designation. Upon being listed in the United States Pharmacopeia, this nonproprietary name becomes the drug's official name. Additionally, the manufacturer assigns a proprietary name or trademark, which serves as the brand name under which the drug is marketed. It is worth noting that...
Pharmaceutical equivalents, by definition, are drug products with the same active ingredient in the same quantities, encapsulated in identical dosage forms, and intended for the same administration routes. These pharmaceutical equivalents are deemed bioequivalent if the bioavailability of the active entity in the drug preparations is similar. Moreover, pharmaceutical equivalents demonstrating bioequivalence are also regarded as therapeutically equivalent. This means that when used as directed,...

