Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Atom Probe Tomography Studies on the CuIn,GaSe2 Grain Boundaries
Published on: April 22, 2013
A way to identify whether a DFT gap is from right reasons or error cancellations: The case of copper chalcogenides
Jiale Shen1, Haitao Liu2,3, Yuanchang Li1
1Key Lab of Advanced Optoelectronic Quantum Architecture and Measurement (MOE), and Advanced Research Institute of Multidisciplinary Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Abstract:
Gap opening remains elusive in copper chalcogenides (Cu2X, X = S, Se, and Te), not least because Hubbard + U, hybrid functional, and GW methods have also failed. In this work, we elucidate that their failure originates from a severe underestimation of the 4s-3d orbital splitting of the Cu atom, which leads to a band-order inversion in the presence of an anionic crystal field. As a result, the Fermi energy is pinned due to symmetry, yielding an invariant zero gap. Utilizing the hybrid pseudopotentials to correct the underestimation on the atomic side opens up gaps of experimental magnitude in Cu2X, suggesting their predominantly electronic nature. Our work not only clarifies the debate about the Cu2X gap but also provides a way to identify which of the different methods really captures the physical essence and which is the result of error cancellation.

