Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Serial Position Effect01:03

Serial Position Effect

169
The serial position effect is a cognitive phenomenon where individuals are more likely to recall the first and last items in a list compared to those in the middle. This effect is divided into the primacy effect and the recency effect. The primacy effect is observed when the initial items in a list are remembered better. This occurs because these items are rehearsed more frequently or receive more elaborative processing, allowing them to be encoded into long-term memory more effectively. For...
169
Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

134
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
134
Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory01:22

Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory

198
Improving short-term memory can be achieved through techniques like chunking and rehearsal. Chunking involves organizing information into larger, more manageable units. This technique is particularly useful for information that exceeds the typical memory span of between five and nine items. For instance, logging into an online account with a password like "ta89vq0179gz" involves grouping letters and numbers into three chunks—ta89, vq01, and 79gz. It makes large amounts of...
198

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reliability, bias, and computational cost of estimating the Bayes factor using bridge sampling and the Savage-Dickey density ratio.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Detection of culprit presence in multiple-culprit crimes: A comparison of combined and separate lineup-presentation formats.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Assessing the role of attentional inhibition and cognitive flexibility in convergent and divergent thinking during creative task performance.

BMC psychology·2026
Same author

Design and acceptance assessment of a digital product passport for recycled and natural aggregate concrete elements.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Correction: Space exploration and lifestyle medicine: a narrative review of its implications for astronaut health and remote Earth-based environments.

Frontiers in physiology·2026
Same author

Investigating the reproducibility of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2025

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.2K

Changing-state irrelevant speech disrupts visual-verbal but not visual-spatial serial recall.

John E Marsh1, Mark J Hurlstone2, Alexandre Marois3

  • 1School of Psychology and Humanities, University of Central Lancashire.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|June 24, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Replicating a key study on short-term memory, this research found that auditory distraction effects differed between visual-verbal and visual-spatial recall tasks. This challenges the idea of a single, amodal mechanism for serial order representation.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.5K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2025

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.2K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.5K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Auditory Distraction
  • Short-Term Memory

Background:

  • Jones et al. (1995) proposed an amodal mechanism for serial order representation in short-term memory based on auditory distraction.
  • Their findings suggested auditory distraction effects were similar across visual-verbal and visual-spatial tasks.
  • The robustness of these findings has been questioned due to a lack of replication.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct high-powered replications of Jones et al.'s (1995) Experiment 4.
  • To investigate the changing-state effect in auditory distraction across different short-term memory tasks.
  • To test the amodal mechanism hypothesis against modular and interference-based accounts.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted, replicating Jones et al.'s (1995) Experiment 4.
  • Experiment 1 used a within-participants design (n=64) without a retention period.
  • Experiment 2 used a between-participants design (n=128) with a retention period.

Main Results:

  • The changing-state effect was observed in the visual-verbal serial recall task in both experiments.
  • The changing-state effect was not observed in the visual-spatial serial recall task in either experiment.
  • Results indicated a modality-specific effect of auditory distraction.

Conclusions:

  • The findings challenge the notion of a single, amodal mechanism for serial order representation.
  • Results support modular and interference-based models of auditory distraction.
  • The study highlights differences in how auditory distraction affects visual-verbal versus visual-spatial short-term memory.