Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025
Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
Recurrence of breast cancer after reconstruction with macro-textured silicone breast implants: a retrospective cohort
Jonathan Spoor1, Frederike Dieleman1,2, Eveline M A Bleiker3,4
1Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek.
Background:
Recently, old concerns linking silicone breast implants (SBIs) with breast cancer have resurfaced. These concerns apply specifically to the risk of breast cancer recurrence in patients who received breast reconstructions with macro-textured SBIs. In this study, the authors investigated the effect of breast reconstruction with macro-textured SBIs on long-term oncologic outcomes of breast cancer patients.
Materials And Methods:
The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study in two large cancer centres in the Netherlands. Patients who had been treated for primary breast cancer between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2015 were included. Data on treatment and oncologic outcomes were obtained from prospectively maintained institutional and nationwide registries. Patient files were reviewed manually to complement missing information. Missing data were accounted for by multiple imputations by chained equations (MICE). Reconstruction with a macro-textured SBI was analysed as a time-dependent variable. The main outcomes of interest were locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models.
Results:
Of the 4695 women who were eligible for inclusion, 2393 had undergone mastectomy. Of these women, 1187 (25%) had received breast reconstruction with a macro-textured SBI. The mean follow-up time was 11.5 (SD, 5.0) years. Compared with women who had undergone a simple mastectomy or autologous breast reconstruction, women with an implant-based reconstruction did not differ significantly in LRRFS or DMFS after accounting for various confounding factors [HR 1.27 (95% CI 0.93-1.72) and HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.74-1.20), respectively]. Sensitivity analysis in complete cases of patients and various subgroup analyses yielded similar results.
Conclusion:
Reassuringly, in this multi-centre cohort study no difference was found in long-term oncologic outcomes between women who had received breast reconstruction with a macro-textured SBI and women who had undergone a simple mastectomy or autologous breast reconstruction.
