Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models01:21

Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models

80
Mechanistic models, a category encompassing both physiological and compartmental modeling, differ from empirical models' approaches to incorporating known factors about the systems being modeled. Empirical models describe data with minimal assumptions, while mechanistic models aim to provide a robust description of available data by specifying assumptions and integrating known factors about the system. Compartmental analysis is a key example of a mechanistic model in pharmacokinetics and...
80
Multicompartment Models: Overview01:14

Multicompartment Models: Overview

124
Multicompartment models are mathematical constructs that depict how drugs are distributed and eliminated within the body. They segment the body into several compartments, symbolizing various physiological or anatomical areas connected through drug transfer processes such as absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination.
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
124
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

36
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
36
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

66
Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
66
Signal and System01:26

Signal and System

643
A signal x(t) is a set of data or a time function representing a variable of interest. Signals typically convey information about a phenomenon, such as atmospheric temperature, humidity, human voice, television images, a dog's bark, or birdsongs. More generally, a signal can be a function of more than one independent variable. For instance, images depend on horizontal and vertical positions and can be regarded as two-dimensional signals. However, this text will focus on one-dimensional...
643
Theoretical Approaches to Psychological Disorder01:29

Theoretical Approaches to Psychological Disorder

216
The development of psychological disorders, which are characterized by deviant, maladaptive, and personally distressing behaviors, has been explored through several theoretical approaches.
Biological approach
The biological approach posits that internal, organic factors are the primary causes of such disorders. This perspective emphasizes brain structure and function, genetic predispositions, and neurotransmitter imbalances. For example, schizophrenia has been associated with both genetic...
216
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies
  1. Home
  2. Multimodel Approaches Are Not The Best Way To Understand Multifactorial Systems.
  1. Home
  2. Multimodel Approaches Are Not The Best Way To Understand Multifactorial Systems.

Related Experiment Video

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
08:51

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts

Published on: September 20, 2024

1.2K

Multimodel Approaches Are Not the Best Way to Understand Multifactorial Systems.

Benjamin M Bolker1

  • 1Departments of Mathematics & Statistics and Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S4K1, Canada.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|June 26, 2024

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Ecological researchers should use full statistical models instead of information-theoretic (IT) or multi-model averaging (MMA) approaches for better multifactorial analysis. These methods provide more accurate estimates and reliable confidence intervals for complex ecological processes.

Keywords:
Akaike information criterionmulti-model averagingnull-hypothesis significance testingshrinkage estimatorsstatistical inference

More Related Videos

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.3K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
08:51

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts

Published on: September 20, 2024

1.2K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.3K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Information-theoretic (IT) and multi-model averaging (MMA) are common but suboptimal statistical tools in ecology.
  • These methods often oversimplify ecological systems by testing artificially simplified models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of IT and MMA approaches in ecological research.
  • To propose superior statistical methods for multifactorial ecological analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Critique of Information-Theoretic (IT) model selection.
  • Analysis of Multi-Model Averaging (MMA) shrinkage estimation limitations.
  • Comparison with penalized regression and Bayesian hierarchical models.
  • Evaluation of confidence interval accuracy in MMA.

Main Results:

  • IT methods encourage testing simplified, artificial models.
  • MMA uses basic shrinkage estimation, less efficient than alternatives.
  • MMA confidence intervals are generally overconfident and too narrow.
  • Full statistical models with principled complexity decisions are superior.

Conclusions:

  • IT and MMA are suboptimal for multifactorial ecological research.
  • Penalized regression or Bayesian models offer better shrinkage estimation.
  • Full models with a priori complexity decisions yield reliable estimates and confidence intervals for ecological processes.