Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Teeth01:15

Teeth

376
The formation of teeth, also known as odontogenesis, is a complex process that begins in utero, around the sixth week of embryonic development. There are three stages to this process: the bud stage, the cap stage, and the bell stage.
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin...
376

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Efficacy of Myofascial Release Therapy and Related Soft-Tissue Techniques for Pain in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Piezosurgery-assisted protocol for impacted mandibular third molar removal with 3D facial swelling analysis: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial on post-surgical sequelae.

Clinical oral investigations·2026
Same author

Ten-Year Post-Loading Outcomes of Subcrestally Placed Implants With Internal Conical Connections at 0.5 mm Versus 1.5 mm Depth: A Multicentre Within-Person Randomised Controlled Trial.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
Same author

A novel full digital workflow for dental autotransplantation: surgical accuracy and clinical outcomes in a prospective cohort study.

Frontiers in oral health·2026
Same author

Effectiveness of nonsurgical therapy of peri-implant mucositis: A systematic review.

Periodontology 2000·2026
Same author

Early-Onset Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Emerging Biological Insights, Risk Factors and Clinical Implications.

Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2025

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.5K

Concordance Analysis of Lower Third Molar Surgery Classifications: A Comparative Study.

Selene Barone1, Francesco Bennardo1, Marianna Salviati1

  • 1Department of Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.

Dentistry Journal
|June 26, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Assessing mandibular third molar (M3M) surgery difficulty is complex. Current classification systems show low concordance, indicating a need for more objective, automated methods for evaluating M3M surgical complexity.

Keywords:
difficulty assessmentinferior alveolar nervelower third molarlower third molar classificationsrisk assessmenttooth extractiontooth impacted

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Insights into an Efficient Murine Maxillary Orthodontic Model Protocol
04:11

Author Spotlight: Insights into an Efficient Murine Maxillary Orthodontic Model Protocol

Published on: October 27, 2023

669
The Establishment of a Murine Mandibular Molar Extraction Socket Healing Model
04:19

The Establishment of a Murine Mandibular Molar Extraction Socket Healing Model

Published on: January 13, 2023

3.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2025

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.5K
Author Spotlight: Insights into an Efficient Murine Maxillary Orthodontic Model Protocol
04:11

Author Spotlight: Insights into an Efficient Murine Maxillary Orthodontic Model Protocol

Published on: October 27, 2023

669
The Establishment of a Murine Mandibular Molar Extraction Socket Healing Model
04:19

The Establishment of a Murine Mandibular Molar Extraction Socket Healing Model

Published on: January 13, 2023

3.9K

Area of Science:

  • Oral Surgery
  • Dental Anatomy
  • Surgical Classification Systems

Background:

  • Mandibular third molar (M3M) surgery is frequent and complex.
  • Various classification systems exist for evaluating M3M surgical difficulty.
  • Existing systems aim to standardize assessment and management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the concordance of multiple M3M surgery classification systems.
  • To analyze agreement regarding M3M and inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) relationships.
  • To evaluate agreement on overall surgical difficulty scores.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of six M3M classification systems (JD, Sammartino, Chang, Jhamb, Maglione, Nemsi).
  • Two analyses: M3M-IAN relationship and overall difficulty (angulation, spatial position).
  • Pairwise concordance calculations for specific system comparisons.

Main Results:

  • Low overall concordance (26.1%) for M3M-IAN relationship classifications.
  • Highest pairwise concordance for M3M-IAN was 59.5% (Nemsi et al. and Jhamb et al.).
  • Low overall concordance (25.5%) for total difficulty scores.
  • Highest pairwise concordance for difficulty was 57.4% (Sammartino et al. and Chang et al.).

Conclusions:

  • Current M3M surgical difficulty classifications have significant limitations.
  • Variations in scoring methodology contribute to low inter-rater reliability.
  • An objective, automated, non-operator-dependent classification is required for M3M surgery.