Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

106
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
106
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stimulus Size Modulates Periodic and Aperiodic EEG Components in SSVEP-Based BCIs.

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

Assessing Time-Frequency Analysis Methods for Non-Stationary EMG Bursts: Application to an Animal Model of Parkinson's Disease.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

The unexpected sight: improvement of visual function following intracortical microstimulation of the human occipital cortex.

Brain communications·2026
Same author

Evaluation of Lipid Nanoparticles as Vehicles for Optogenetic Delivery in Primary Cortical Neurons.

Pharmaceutics·2026
Same author

Physiological Response in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) During Social Robot Interaction.

International journal of neural systems·2025
Same author

Deep Learning-Based Control of Electrically Evoked Activity in Human Visual Cortex.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2025

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

4.9K

Decision-Making Time Analysis for Assessing Processing Speed in Athletes during Motor Reaction Tasks.

Leonardo Ariel Cano1,2, Gonzalo Daniel Gerez1,2, María Soledad García1,2

  • 1Neuroscience and Applied Technologies Laboratory (LINTEC), Bioengineering Department, Faculty of Exact Sciences and Technology (FACET), National University of Tucuman (UNT), Superior Institute of Biological Research (INSIBIO), National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Av. Independencia 1800, San Miguel de Tucumán 4000, Argentina.

Sports (Basel, Switzerland)
|June 26, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Athletes exhibit faster processing speeds, completing reaction tasks approximately 30% quicker than controls. Decision-making time analysis reveals athletes’ balanced hand performance, unlike controls, highlighting its importance in sports science.

Keywords:
decision-makingelectromyographyhandednessreaction timesport performance

More Related Videos

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.5K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2025

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

4.9K
Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.5K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Sports Science
  • Human Motor Control
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Reaction time (RT) is a key metric for evaluating physical performance in motor tasks.
  • Assessing processing speed is crucial for understanding athletic capabilities.
  • Previous research has not fully explored the decision-making component of RT in athletes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare processing speed between athletes and a control group.
  • To investigate the decision-making (DMK) and electromechanical delay (EMD) phases of RT.
  • To explore differences in RT and its components based on handedness.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty-five healthy volunteers (16 control, 9 athletes) performed visual-stimulus motor reaction tasks under three difficulty levels.
  • Motion capture and electromyography recorded physiological data.
  • RT was segmented into decision-making (DMK) and electromechanical delay (EMD) phases.

Main Results:

  • Athletes demonstrated significantly faster overall RT (~30% faster than controls).
  • While overall RT showed no hand differences, DMK time differed significantly.
  • Controls exhibited ~20% longer DMK time for right-hand selection compared to left; athletes showed no such disparity.

Conclusions:

  • Quantifying the decision-making component of RT is vital for assessing processing speed in sports.
  • This approach can monitor adaptations in motor-cognitive and neuromuscular processes.
  • Findings offer new perspectives on handedness research in motor control.