Reconstructive surgery for women with female genital mutilation: A scoping review
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Reconstructive surgery for female genital mutilation (FGM) shows high success rates, improving quality of life for survivors. Further research is needed to expand access and address health disparities globally.
Area Of Science
- Public Health
- Surgical Reconstruction
- Women's Health
Background
- Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a significant global public health issue.
- Access to reconstructive surgery for FGM survivors is limited in many regions.
Purpose Of The Study
- To conduct a scoping review on reconstructive surgery for FGM.
- To explore indications, referral pathways, eligibility, care, and outcomes.
- To synthesize current evidence guided by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) principles.
Main Methods
- Searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and trial registers using MeSH terms.
- Included experimental and quasi-experimental studies on FGM reconstructive surgery before June 2023.
- Utilized PRISMA guidelines for data screening, extraction, and analysis.
Main Results
- 40 studies were included, involving 7274 women undergoing reconstruction.
- Clitoral reconstruction (Foldes' technique) was predominant (95%).
- 94% of cases reported post-surgery improvement, with a 3% complication rate.
Conclusions
- Evidence suggests improved sexual function and quality of life post-reconstruction.
- Further research and clinical trials are essential to strengthen the evidence base.
- Advocating for surgical reconstruction is crucial for addressing health disparities and cost-effectiveness.
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.