Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Personal Health Record implementation in rural primary care: A descriptive exploratory study using RE-AIM framework
Selena Davis1, Mindy A Smith2,3, Lindsay Burton4
1Department of Family Practice, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Personal health records (PHRs) offer a comprehensive health story and improved communication. However, challenges with interoperability, patient agency, and provider support hindered widespread adoption and maintenance in rural settings.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Patient Engagement
- Rural Health
Background:
- Personal health records (PHRs) are emerging as patient-centric tools for shared decision-making and healthcare data management.
- Rural healthcare settings face unique challenges in adopting new digital health technologies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore rural patients' and providers' perceptions of PHR implementation using the RE-AIM framework.
- To evaluate the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of a PHR in a rural context.
Main Methods:
- A mixed-methods approach including pre-/post-intervention patient surveys, provider interviews, and administrative data.
- Focus groups were conducted with patients and providers to gather pre- and post-implementation perspectives.
- The RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework guided the evaluation.
Main Results:
- PHRs were perceived to enhance communication and provide a comprehensive health narrative, with patients prioritizing health promotion data and providers favoring clinical data.
- Evaluation indicated limited patient reach (16%), neutral patient satisfaction, and no significant changes in quality of life or self-efficacy.
- Clinic adoption was moderate (44%), favoring public clinics in smaller, more remote communities. Key barriers included lack of interoperability and implementation challenges exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
- All participating clinics discontinued PHR use within the study period due to significant barriers.
Conclusions:
- The RE-AIM framework provides a comprehensive evaluation of PHR impact in rural settings.
- Critical obstacles to successful PHR implementation include achieving system interoperability, ensuring patient agency and control, and providing adequate provider training and support.
- Future PHR initiatives must address these barriers to improve patient engagement and healthcare data management in rural communities.
Related Concept Videos
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Purpose of Health Records II
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...

