Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Lung CT Segmentation to Identify Consolidations and Ground Glass Areas for Quantitative Assesment of SARS-CoV Pneumonia
Published on: December 19, 2020
Effect of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction on Image Quality of Chest Computed Tomography for COVID-19 Pneumonia
Caiyin Liu1, Junkun Lin1, Yingjie Chen1
1From the Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Purpose:
This study aimed to compare the image quality of chest computed tomography (CT) scans for COVID-19 pneumonia using forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution-LUNG (FIRST-LUNG) with filtered back projection (FBP) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR).
Method:
The CT images of 44 inpatients diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia between December 2022 and June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The CT images were reconstructed using FBP, HIR, and FIRST-LUNG-MILD/STANDARD/STRONG. The CT values and noise of the lumen of the main trachea and erector spine muscle were measured for each group. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Subjective evaluations included overall image quality, noise, streak artifact, visualization of normal lung structures, and abnormal CT features. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the objective and subjective indicators among the five groups. The task-based transfer function was derived for three distinct contrasts representing anatomical structures, lower-contrast lesion, and higher-contrast lesion.
Results:
The results of the study demonstrated significant differences in image noise, SNR, and CNR among the five groups ( P < 0.001). The FBP images exhibited the highest levels of noise and the lowest SNR and CNR among the five groups ( P < 0.001). When compared to the FBP and HIR groups, the noise was lower in the FIRST-LUNG-MILD/STANDARD/STRONG group, while the SNR and CNR were higher ( P < 0.001). The subjective overall image quality score of FIRST-LUNG-MILD/STANDARD was significantly better than FBP and FIRST-LUNG-STRONG ( P < 0.001). FIRST-LUNG-MILD was superior to FBP, HIR, FIRST-LUNG-STANDARD, and FIRST-LUNG-STRONG in visualizing proximal and peripheral bronchovascular and subpleural vessels ( P < 0.05). Additionally, FIRST-LUNG-MILD achieved the best scores in evaluating abnormal lung structure ( P < 0.001). The overall interobserver agreement was substantial (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.891). The task-based transfer function 50% values of FIRST reconstructions are consistently higher compared to FBP and HIR.
Conclusions:
The FIRST-LUNG-MILD/STANDARD algorithm can enhance the image quality of chest CT in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, while preserving important details of the lesions, better than the FBP and HIR algorithms. After evaluating various COVID-19 pneumonia lesions and considering the improvement in image quality, we recommend using the FIRST-LUNG-MILD reconstruction for diagnosing COVID-19 pneumonia.
More Related Videos
02:09Multi-modal Pulmonary Imaging: Using Complementary Information from CT and Hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI to Evaluate Lung Structure-Function
Published on: April 12, 2024
05:56Author Spotlight: Enhancing Diagnostic Strategies and Biomarker Development for Comprehensive Lung Function Analysis
Published on: August 9, 2024