Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025
External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
Accidental uterine extensions in cesarean deliveries - outcome of subsequent pregnancy
Shlomi Toussia-Cohen1,2, Aviran Ohayon1,2, Hila Lahav-Ezra1,2
1The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 26744 Chaim Sheba Medical Center , Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Objectives:
To explore the obstetric, maternal and neonatal outcome in the subsequent pregnancy after a pregnancy with an accidental uterine extension (AUE) during cesarean delivery (CD), as well as the relationship between the different types of AUE (inferior, lateral and superior).
Methods:
A retrospective cohort study of all CD with AUE in a tertiary medical center between 01/2011-01/2022. Women with a prior CD with AUE were compared to a 1:3 ratio matched control group of women with a prior CD without AUE. All AUE were defined in their direction, size and mode of suturing. CD with deliberate uterine extensions were excluded. We evaluated obstetric, maternal and neonatal outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy after a pregnancy with AUE during CD.
Results:
Comparing women with a prior CD with AUE (n=177) to the matched control group of women with a prior CD without AUE (n=528), we found no significant differences in proportions of uterine rupture or any other major complication or adverse outcome between the groups. There were no significant differences in the outcomes of the subsequent pregnancy in relation to the characteristics of the AUE (direction, size and mode of suturing).
Conclusions:
Subsequent pregnancies after AUE are not associated with higher maternal or neonatal adverse outcomes including higher proportions of uterine rupture compared to pregnancies without previous AUE. Different characteristics of the AUE do not impact the outcome.
