Cerebral Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage due to Implantation of Electrodes for Deep Brain Stimulation: Insights from a

Bastian E A Sajonz1, Timo S Brugger1,2,3,4, Marco Reisert1,5

  • 1Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.

Brain Sciences
|June 27, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Cerebral intraparenchymal hemorrhage due to electrode implantation (CIPHEI) is a rare complication of deep brain stimulation (DBS). Older age, high invasivity, and directional DBS electrodes significantly increase CIPHEI risk when combined.

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Neurology
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Cerebral intraparenchymal hemorrhage due to electrode implantation (CIPHEI) is a serious complication of deep brain stimulation (DBS).
  • Understanding risk factors is crucial for patient safety during DBS surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the frequency of CIPHEI in a large single-center cohort.
  • To identify patient- and procedure-related risk factors and their interactions for CIPHEI.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of DBS implantations from January 2013 to December 2021.
  • Generalized linear model with bias reduction to analyze risk factors.
  • Consideration of age, gender, hypertension, invasivity, electrode types, and DBS electrode implantation.

Main Results:

  • 17 CIPHEI cases were identified across 839 electrode implantations (3.9% frequency).
  • A three-way interaction of older age (>60 years), high invasivity (combined micro/macroelectrodes), and directional DBS electrodes accounted for 82.4% of CIPHEI cases.
  • Acquired platelet dysfunction was found in only one case.

Conclusions:

  • Older age, high invasivity, and directional DBS electrode implantation are significant risk factors for CIPHEI, particularly when combined.
  • Directional DBS electrodes represent a newly identified potential risk factor.
  • Risk is driven by the combined presence of these factors, not independently, highlighting the need for careful procedural risk evaluation in at-risk patients.

Related Concept Videos