Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Adaptation of Semiautomated Circulating Tumor Cell CTC Assays for Clinical and Preclinical Research Applications
Published on: February 28, 2014
Perspectives on Clinical Adoption Barriers to Blood-Based Multi-Cancer Early Detection Tests across Stakeholders
Monica M Schroll1, Elissa Quinn2, Daryl Pritchard3
1Health Advances LLC, 101 2nd Street, Suite 800, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA.
Blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests show promise for improving cancer screening. Key barriers to adoption include data gaps, patient costs, and payer coverage, requiring further investment and education.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Preventive Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Current cancer screening guidelines from the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) focus on specific cancers, missing opportunities for early detection in other indications.
- A significant proportion of cancer cases are diagnosed at advanced stages, contributing to higher mortality rates.
- Blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests offer a novel approach to screen for multiple cancer types simultaneously, including those not routinely screened.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess current cancer screening practices among healthcare providers (HCPs), payers, and patients in the U.S.
- To identify perceived barriers and facilitators for the adoption of blood-based MCED tests.
- To understand the value proposition and anticipated utilization of MCED tests within the U.S. health system.
Main Methods:
- A survey was conducted among U.S. healthcare providers, payers, and patients.
- The survey focused on current cancer screening test utilization and perceptions of blood-based MCED tests.
- Data analysis aimed to identify trends in adoption and barriers to widespread use.
Main Results:
- The healthcare community generally favors the adoption of blood-based MCED tests, recognizing their value proposition.
- Current limited utilization is attributed to concerns regarding clinical accuracy and utility data.
- High out-of-pocket patient costs and inadequate payer coverage were identified as significant adoption hurdles.
Conclusions:
- Widespread adoption of blood-based MCED tests requires addressing current barriers.
- Increased investment in generating robust clinical data is crucial.
- Enhanced education for healthcare providers and improved logistical support are essential for successful implementation.
More Related Videos
10:35A Blood-based Test for the Detection of ROS1 and RET Fusion Transcripts from Circulating Ribonucleic Acid Using Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: April 5, 2018
08:49Automatic Separation and Collection of Cancer-Related Substances from Clinical Samples
Published on: January 13, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Cancer Prevention
Some...