Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025

In Situ Neutron Powder Diffraction Using Custom-made Lithium-ion Batteries
Published on: November 10, 2014
Electron-Deficient Multicenter Bonding in Phase Change Materials: A Chance for Reconciliation
Francisco Javier Manjón1, Hussien H Osman1,2,3, Matteo Savastano4
1Instituto de Diseño para la Fabricación y Producción Automatizada, MALTA Consolider Team, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
The chemical bonding in phase change materials (PCMs) is debated. This study suggests electron-deficient multicenter bonds reconcile hypervalent and metavalent models, explaining PCM properties.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Solid-State Chemistry
- Crystallography
Background:
- Phase change materials (PCMs), including minerals like galena (PbS), exhibit unique properties attributed to their bonding.
- A decade-long debate exists between the hypervalent (electron-rich multicenter) and metavalent (electron-deficient) bonding models for PCMs.
- A third model, electron-deficient multicenter bonding, has recently emerged.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the hypervalent and metavalent bonding models.
- To review the three proposed bonding models for phase change materials.
- To propose a unified understanding of chemical bonding in PCMs.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of the hypervalent and metavalent bonding models.
- Review of existing literature on PCM bonding theories.
- Case studies examining chemical bonding in GeSe, SnSe under pressure, and various polyiodides.
Main Results:
- The study highlights limitations of both hypervalent and metavalent models in fully explaining PCM behavior.
- Analysis of GeSe, SnSe, and polyiodides provides evidence supporting a specific bonding mechanism.
- The electron-deficient multicenter bonding model offers a unifying framework.
Conclusions:
- Both hypervalent and metavalent bonding models can be reconciled within the framework of electron-deficient multicenter bonding.
- This unified model better explains the extraordinary properties of phase change materials.
- The findings encourage a shift in perspective towards electron-deficient multicenter bonding for PCMs.
More Related Videos
12:02Determination of Thermodynamic Properties of Alkaline Earth-liquid Metal Alloys Using the Electromotive Force Technique
Published on: November 3, 2017
07:24Quantitative Atomic-Site Analysis of Functional Dopants/Point Defects in Crystalline Materials by Electron-Channeling-Enhanced Microanalysis
Published on: May 10, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Bonding in Metals
Types of Chemical Bonds
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Ionic Bonding and Electron Transfer
Bond Polarity, Dipole Moment, and Percent Ionic Character
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...