Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Physiological effects of plus lens application.

L J Press

    American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics
    |June 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Prescribing convex lenses for near vision is debated. Research shows physiological responses to these plus lenses are highly individualized, impacting clinical decisions.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A randomized trial of the effect of single-vision vs. bifocal lenses on myopia progression in children with esophoria.

    Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2001
    Same author

    The normal optic nerve head.

    Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2001
    Same author

    The dichotomy of vision and learning in optometric practice: implications for delivery of care.

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·2000
    Same author

    Relationship between anisometropia, amblyopia, and binocularity.

    Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·1999
    Same author

    Effect of VDUs on the eyes.

    Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·1997
    Same author

    Refractive surgery.

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·1997
    Same journal

    Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Stiles-Burch two-degree color mixture data.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Undercorrection and myopia development.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    The International Optometric and Optical League.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Quantitative photorefraction using an off-center flash source.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    An objective VER assessment of visual acuity compared with subjective measures.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Vision Science

    Background:

    • Low-power spherical convex lenses (plus lenses) are sometimes prescribed for near vision tasks.
    • Prescription is based on proposed visual and physiological responses.
    • Previous research indicates significant variability in patient responses.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To reevaluate existing research on the clinical use of plus lenses for nearpoint.
    • To analyze the individualized physiological effects of plus lenses.
    • To inform evidence-based clinical prescribing practices.

    Main Methods:

    • Systematic review of scientific literature.
    • Analysis of studies investigating visual and physiological responses to plus lenses.
    • Contextualization of findings within clinical optometric practice.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Physiological effects of plus lenses demonstrate high inter-individual variability.
    • The efficacy and impact of plus lenses are not uniform across patients.
    • Clinical outcomes are influenced by unique patient responses.

    Conclusions:

    • The highly individualized nature of physiological responses to plus lenses necessitates careful consideration in clinical prescribing.
    • Prescribing decisions should account for patient-specific effects rather than generalized assumptions.
    • Further research may refine personalized approaches to plus lens prescription.