Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025

09:48
Microcrystal Electron Diffraction of Small Molecules
Published on: March 15, 2021
6.6K
TAAM refinement on high-resolution experimental and simulated 3D ED/MicroED data for organic molecules.
Anil Kumar1, Kunal Kumar Jha1, Barbara Olech1
1Biological and Chemical Research Centre, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, ul. Żwirki i Wigury 101, 02-089 Warszawa, Poland.
Acta Crystallographica. Section C, Structural Chemistry
|June 27, 2024
Summary
Transferable aspherical atom model (TAAM) refinement of 3D electron diffraction (3D ED) data improves electrostatic potential representation for organic crystals. TAAM offers more accurate hydrogen atom positions compared to independent atom model (IAM) refinements.
Area of Science:
- Crystallography
- Materials Science
- Chemistry
Background:
- 3D electron diffraction (3D ED), also known as microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED), is an emerging technique for high-resolution crystal structure determination.
- This method is particularly valuable for analyzing sub-micron-sized crystals, which are often challenging for traditional X-ray diffraction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of Independent Atom Model (IAM) and Transferable Aspherical Atom Model (TAAM) refinements using 3D ED data.
- To assess the accuracy of TAAM in representing the experimental electrostatic potential of organic crystals.
- To evaluate geometrical parameters and atomic displacement parameters (ADPs) from 3D ED refinements against simulations and published data.
Main Methods:
- Collection of high-resolution 3D ED data from L-alanine, α-glycine, and urea using an in-house TEM instrument.
- Kinematical refinement of crystal structures using both IAM and TAAM against experimental and simulated 3D ED data.
- Comparison of refinement results with periodic density functional theory (DFT) calculations and published X-ray and neutron diffraction data.
Main Results:
- TAAM refinement significantly improved model fitting statistics (R factors, residual electrostatic potential) compared to IAM for both experimental and simulated 3D ED data.
- TAAM better represents the experimental electrostatic potential of organic crystals than IAM.
- Experimental 3D ED data yielded more accurate hydrogen atom positions than IAM refinements on X-ray diffraction data.
- TAAM refinements did not improve the accuracy of non-hydrogen bond lengths, and IAM refinements on 3D ED data showed statistically insignificant differences in X-H bond lengths compared to TAAM.
Conclusions:
- TAAM is a superior model for refining 3D ED data of organic crystals, particularly for electrostatic potential and hydrogen atom positioning.
- While TAAM enhances electrostatic potential representation, it does not significantly improve non-hydrogen bond length accuracy in this study.
- Discrepancies in atomic displacement parameters suggest potential influences of unmodeled effects like radiation damage or dynamical scattering in 3D ED data.

