Prognostic value of the international association for the study of lung cancer grading system and its association with the tumor microenvironment in stage I EGFR-muted lung adenocarcinoma
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) grading system predicts outcomes for EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma. Grade 3 tumors show a more aggressive tumor microenvironment (TME), correlating with poorer patient survival.
Area Of Science
- Oncology
- Pathology
- Cancer Research
Background
- The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) grading system is utilized to predict outcomes in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.
- Understanding the prognostic implications of this grading system, particularly in EGFR-mutated cases, is crucial for personalized treatment strategies.
Purpose Of The Study
- To investigate the prognostic value of the IASLC grading system in Stage I EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma.
- To explore the association between IASLC tumor grades and the tumor microenvironment (TME) composition.
Main Methods
- Compared clinicopathological characteristics of 296 EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinomas based on IASLC grade.
- Analyzed E-cadherin expression, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) using digital pathology.
Main Results
- Grade 3 IASLC classification was associated with significantly shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared to grades 1 and 2.
- Invasive size, lymphatic permeation, and Grade 3 were independent poor prognostic factors for RFS.
- Grade 3 tumors exhibited higher numbers of CD204+ TAMs and PDPN+ CAFs, indicating a more pro-tumorigenic TME.
Conclusions
- The IASLC grading system effectively correlates with outcomes in EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma.
- Grade 3 tumors possess a TME composition that promotes tumor progression, explaining their unfavorable prognosis.

