Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Clinical Implementation and Dosimetric Evaluation of a Robust Proton Lattice Planning Strategy Using Primary and
Sina Mossahebi1, Jason K Molitoris1, Yannick Poirier2
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Purpose:
Pencil-beam scanning proton therapy has been considered a potential modality for the 3D form of spatially fractionated radiation therapy called lattice therapy. However, few practical solutions have been introduced in the clinic. Existing limitations include degradation in plan quality and robustness when using single-field versus multifield lattice plans, respectively. We propose a practical and robust proton lattice (RPL) planning method using multifield and evaluate its dosimetric characteristics compared to clinically acceptable photon lattice plans.
Methods And Materials:
Seven cases previously treated with photon lattice therapy were used to evaluate a novel RPL planning technique using 2-orthogonal beams: a primary beam (PB) and a robust complementary beam (RCB) that deliver 67% and 33%, respectively, of the prescribed dose to vertices inside the gross target volume (GTV). Only RCB is robustly optimized for setup and range uncertainties. The number and volume of vertices, peak-to-valley dose ratios (PVDRs), and volume of low dose to GTV of proton and photon plans were compared. The RPL technique was then used in the treatment of 2 patients and their dosimetric parameters were reported.
Results:
The RPL strategy was able to achieve the clinical planning goals. Compared to previously treated photon plans, the average number of vertices increased by 30%, the average vertex volume by 49% (18.2 ± 25.9 cc vs 12.2 ± 14.5 cc, P = .21), and higher PVDR (10.5 ± 4.8 vs 2.5 ± 0.9, P < .005) was achieved. In addition, RPL plans show more conformal dose with less low dose to GTV (V30%, 60.9% ± 7.2% vs 81.6% ± 13.9% and V10%, 88.3% ± 4.5% vs 98.6% ± 3.6% [P < .01]). The RPL plan for 2 treated patients showed PVDRs of 4.61 and 14.85 with vertices-to-GTV ratios of 1.52% and 1.30%, respectively.
Conclusions:
A novel RPL planning strategy using a pair of orthogonal beams was developed and successfully translated to the clinic. The proposed method can generate better quality plans, a higher number of vertices, and higher PVDRs than currently used photon lattice plans.
