Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Based Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable and
David Hong1, Hyunsoo Kim2,3, Hankil Lee4
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Insights
Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-based percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is more cost-effective than angiography-based PCI, improving quality of life and reducing adverse events. This approach offers significant long-term economic benefits across different healthcare systems.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Economics
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Limited research exists on the cost-effectiveness of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to traditional angiography-guided PCI.
- Understanding the long-term economic implications of FFR-based PCI is crucial for clinical decision-making and healthcare resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of FFR-based PCI versus angiography-based PCI.
- To assess the impact of FFR-based PCI on patient outcomes and healthcare costs in a nationwide cohort.
Main Methods:
- A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using nationwide Korean healthcare data (NHIS-HIRA) and a decision/Markov model incorporating US and UK healthcare system values.
- The study analyzed a cohort of patients with stable or unstable angina undergoing PCI.
- Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was calculated to determine the cost per additional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.
Main Results:
- FFR-based PCI was associated with significantly lower risks of all-cause death and spontaneous myocardial infarction at 4 years compared to angiography-based PCI.
- In Korea, FFR-based PCI demonstrated cost-effectiveness, gaining QALYs at a lower cost (ICER: -$7,748) over 4 years.
- FFR-based PCI proved dominant across Korean, US, and UK healthcare systems over a 10-year horizon, with consistently favorable ICERs in sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions:
- FFR-based PCI is associated with improved quality of life and reduced costs compared to angiography-based PCI.
- FFR-guided PCI is a cost-effective strategy for patients with stable or unstable angina undergoing PCI, offering significant economic advantages.
Background:
There are limited studies on the cost-effectiveness of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-based percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over angiography-based PCI.
Objectives:
The current study sought to evaluate long-term cost-effectiveness of FFR-based PCI compared to angiography-based PCI.
Methods:
A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a nationwide cohort that consisted of patients with stable or unstable angina from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) and Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) database in Korea. The cost-effectiveness analysis was also performed by using a decision and Markov model with key values from the United States and the United Kingdom health care systems. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), an indicator of incremental cost on additional quality-adjusted life-years gained by FFR-based PCI, was evaluated.
Results:
In the NHIS-HIRA data, FFR-based PCI was used during the index PCI in 5,116 patients (3.8%) among 134,613 eligible patients. FFR-based PCI showed significantly lower risk of all-cause death (5.8% vs 7.7%, P = 0.001) and spontaneous myocardial infarction (1.6% vs 2.2%, P = 0.022) than the angiography-based PCI at 4 years. In the NHIS-HIRA data, FFR-based PCI gained 0.039 quality-adjusted life-years at a lower cost ($303) than angiography-based PCI, yielding an ICER of -$7,748 during the 4-year follow-up. FFR-based PCI was dominant in the health care system of Korea (ICER = -$7,309), United States (ICER = -$31,267), and United Kingdom (ICER = -$1,341) during a 10-year time horizon. These results were consistently shown in probabilistic sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions:
In the current cohort, FFR-based PCI was associated with higher quality of life at a lower cost than angiography-based PCI. FFR-based PCI was cost-effective in patients with stable or unstable angina undergoing PCI.
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
05:07Author Spotlight: Improved Localization and Monitoring of Coronary Flow Reserve Using Modified PLAX View in Mice
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina II: Classification
Angina IV: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care