Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
ADDRESSING SELECTION BIAS AND MEASUREMENT ERROR IN COVID-19 CASE COUNT DATA USING AUXILIARY INFORMATION
1DEPARTMENT OF BIOSTATISTICS, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, ANN ARBOR, MI 48109.
Limited COVID-19 testing data is hampered by measurement error and selection bias. This study introduces a doubly robust method to correct these biases, improving the accuracy of epidemiological forecasts and prevalence estimations.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
- Public Health
Background:
- Coronavirus case-count data significantly influences public health policies and epidemiological modeling.
- Limited testing capacity and inherent biases (measurement error, selection bias) hinder accurate understanding of the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Increased testing alone does not fully resolve issues of measurement error and selection bias.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the impact of measurement error and selection bias on COVID-19 prevalence and reproduction number estimations.
- To develop a novel, doubly robust estimation method addressing both measurement error and selection bias.
- To apply the developed method for estimating active infection prevalence in Indiana.
Main Methods:
- Demonstrated that large-scale molecular test data can have similar mean square error as small random samples due to biases.
- Developed a procedure combining case-count data and random samples to estimate selection propensities using covariate information.
- Constructed a doubly robust estimation method integrating selection propensities with epidemiological forecast models.
Main Results:
- Estimates from millions of molecular tests showed comparable mean square error to small random samples, highlighting bias issues.
- The doubly robust method was applied to Indiana data, integrating case counts, hospitalizations, deaths, demographics, a random molecular sample, and survey data.
- Accurate estimation of active infection prevalence was achieved by accounting for measurement error and selection bias.
Conclusions:
- Measurement error and selection bias are critical limitations in COVID-19 data, impacting policy and forecasting.
- The proposed doubly robust method offers a more accurate approach to estimating disease prevalence and understanding pandemic dynamics.
- Recommendations are provided based on the methodology to improve future epidemiological surveillance and modeling.
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Censoring Survival Data
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Contingency Table
Steps in Outbreak Investigation

