Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.3K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

106
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
106
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

3.9K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.9K
Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

12.9K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
12.9K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learning to select computations in recurrent neural circuits.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Neural representation of the decisional reference point in monkeys.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Neural representation of the decisional reference point in monkeys.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Computational Properties of the Prefrontal Cortex.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Orbitofrontal cortex computes gaze-dependent comparisons between attributes rather than integrated values.

PLoS biology·2025
Same author

Attention-dependent attribute comparisons underlie multi-attribute decision-making in orbitofrontal cortex.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same journal

Sensorimotor Adaptation of Vocal Pitch Is Impaired in Cerebellar Ataxia.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Memory in the Palm of Your Hand: Smartphone-based Methods for Measuring Memory in the Wild.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Processing Asymmetry in Object-modifying Relative Clauses: Evidence from Functional Connectivity.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Extensive Experience Remodels Neural Task Circuitry to Escape the Frontal Bottleneck and Increase Automaticity of Categorization.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Investigating the Effects of Acute Stress on Neural Mechanisms of Self-controlled Decision-making.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Distilling the Neurophenomenological Signatures of Pure Awareness during Transcendental Meditation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.0K

Multiattribute Decision-making in Macaques Relies on Direct Attribute Comparisons.

Aster Q Perkins1, Zachary S Gillis1,2, Erin L Rich1

  • 1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY.

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|June 28, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Rhesus macaques showed impaired decision-making when attribute mappings changed, suggesting value-based choices involve direct comparisons of similar attributes. This highlights attribute-specific processing in multiattribute decision tasks.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.0K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Primate Cognition

Background:

  • Value-based decisions often involve multiple attributes (e.g., cost, quality).
  • Traditional models integrate attribute values, but behavioral anomalies suggest attribute-specific processing.
  • Understanding how animals process multiattribute information is crucial for decision-making research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate attribute-specific processing in value-based decision-making in rhesus macaques.
  • To determine if monkeys directly compare similar attributes within multiattribute options.
  • To explore the impact of attribute mapping consistency on choice accuracy and preference variability.

Main Methods:

  • Rhesus macaques performed a value-based decision task with options varying in sweetness and probability attributes.
  • Attribute magnitude was represented by bar size, with two mappings: bigger=better or bigger=worse.
  • Researchers analyzed choice accuracy, preference variability, and gaze patterns to assess decision strategies.

Main Results:

  • Decision accuracy decreased and preference variability increased when like attributes had differing mappings.
  • This impairment was not observed when unalike attributes within the same option had different mappings.
  • Gaze patterns indicated monkeys preferentially sampled like attributes sequentially for within-attribute comparisons.

Conclusions:

  • Rhesus macaques exhibit attribute-specific processing during value-based decisions.
  • Direct comparison of like attributes is a key component of multiattribute decision-making in primates.
  • Findings challenge integrated utility models and support models incorporating attribute-specific computations.