Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025

06:35
Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
Published on: April 28, 2016
34.0K
Children's representation of coincidence
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, USA.
Cognition
|June 28, 2024
Summary
Children develop an understanding of coincidences by recognizing the absence of explanations. This ability emerges in early childhood and evolves through the school-age years, with older children showing adult-like reasoning about improbable events.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Development
- Psychology of Coincidence
Background:
- Limited research exists on the early development of coincidence representations in children.
- Adults' judgments of coincidence are influenced by the presence of explanations and the number of co-occurring events.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore factors influencing coincidence representations in adults and children.
- To investigate the developmental trajectory of understanding coincidences from early childhood.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments were conducted where participants read stories of co-occurring events and judged them as coincidences.
- Adults' and children's (4-10 years) judgments were analyzed based on the presence of explanations and the number of events.
Main Results:
- Adults were more likely to deem events coincidental when no plausible explanation was present.
- Adults rejected scenarios with too many co-occurring events, inferring an explanation.
- Children also represent coincidences based on the absence of explanations, with older children mirroring adult reasoning.
Conclusions:
- The representation of coincidence is present from early life but undergoes developmental changes.
- Understanding of coincidence in children develops through the school-age years.
- Sensitivity to the number of co-occurring events emerges later in development.
Related Concept Videos
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
The Representativeness Heuristic
15.8K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
15.8K
Schemas
11.6K
A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
11.6K
Hindsight Biases
3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
3.4K
Nonconscious Mimicry
4.5K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
4.5K
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving
3.8K
In multiple dimensions, the conservation of momentum applies in each direction independently. Hence, to solve collisions in multiple dimensions, we should write down the momentum conservation in each direction separately. To help understand collisions in multiple dimensions, consider an example.
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...
3.8K

