Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Utility of Pancreatic Perivascular Adipose Tissue as a CT Imaging Biomarker for Diagnosing Type 2 Diabetes.

Diabetes·2026
Same author

Deep Learning-Based Identification of Surgical Candidacy for Cervical Spinal Cord Decompression.

International journal of spine surgery·2026
Same author

ROADMAP: An Ontology of Medical AI Models and Datasets.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2026
Same author

The Perceived Roles of AI in Clinical Practice: National Survey of 941 Academic Physicians.

JMIR AI·2025
Same author

Simplify or Stratify? The Debate over Medical School Grading Systems.

The New England journal of medicine·2025
Same author

Landmark-Based Pancreas Sub-region Segmentation in CT.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2025

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
04:48

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography

Published on: November 30, 2022

2.7K

A Comparison of CT-Based Pancreatic Segmentation Deep Learning Models.

Abhinav Suri1, Pritam Mukherjee2, Perry J Pickhardt3

  • 1Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Academic Radiology
|June 29, 2024
PubMed
Summary

TotalSegmentator, Abdomen Atlas, and AASwin models demonstrated strong pancreas segmentation performance. However, performance varied with scan characteristics, indicating a need for nuanced evaluation beyond aggregate metrics.

Keywords:
Artificial intelligenceComputed tomography (CT)PancreasSegmentation

More Related Videos

Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Cryo-Electron Tomograms
10:25

Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Cryo-Electron Tomograms

Published on: November 11, 2022

8.7K
Swin-PSAxialNet: An Efficient Multi-Organ Segmentation Technique
04:48

Swin-PSAxialNet: An Efficient Multi-Organ Segmentation Technique

Published on: July 5, 2024

385

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2025

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
04:48

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography

Published on: November 30, 2022

2.7K
Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Cryo-Electron Tomograms
10:25

Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Cryo-Electron Tomograms

Published on: November 11, 2022

8.7K
Swin-PSAxialNet: An Efficient Multi-Organ Segmentation Technique
04:48

Swin-PSAxialNet: An Efficient Multi-Organ Segmentation Technique

Published on: July 5, 2024

385

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence
  • Radiology and Computational Pathology
  • Biomedical Engineering and Machine Learning

Background:

  • Accurate pancreas segmentation on CT scans is crucial for diagnosing pancreatic diseases and developing imaging biomarkers.
  • Existing studies often rely on aggregate performance metrics, potentially masking variations in model performance across different patient and scan characteristics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To benchmark the performance of five leading pancreas segmentation models using multiple metrics.
  • To evaluate how segmentation performance is affected by scan characteristics, including contrast status and peri-pancreatic attenuation.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study identified five high-performing pancreas segmentation models (TotalSegmentator, Abdomen Atlas, nnUNetv1, AASwin, DM-UNet).
  • Models were evaluated on 352 CT scans using Dice score, Hausdorff distance, and average surface distance.
  • Results were stratified by contrast status and peri-pancreatic attenuation; multivariate regression identified factors associated with segmentation accuracy.

Main Results:

  • TotalSegmentator, Abdomen Atlas, and AASwin were top performers with Dice scores around 77-80%.
  • Performance decreased on non-contrast scans for AASwin and nnUNetv1 (P < .001).
  • Increasing peri-pancreatic attenuation negatively impacted Dice scores for all models except TotalSegmentator (P < .01).

Conclusions:

  • Convolutional neural network-based models trained on diverse datasets (TotalSegmentator, Abdomen Atlas, AASwin) showed the best performance.
  • TotalSegmentator achieved comparable results to models trained on larger datasets, highlighting training data efficiency.
  • Differential performance across patient and scanning characteristics necessitates comprehensive evaluation beyond aggregate metrics for clinical applicability.