Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025

Measuring Liver Mitochondrial Oxygen Consumption and Proton Leak Kinetics to Estimate Mitochondrial Respiration in Holstein Dairy Cattle
Published on: November 30, 2018
Derivation of the maintenance energy requirements in Jersey cows differing in body condition score
1Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583.
Abstract:
Research in a variety of species including cattle has suggested energy required for maintenance may be affected by body condition. The objective of this study was to use indirect calorimetry and total fecal and urine collections to estimate maintenance energy and fasting heat production (FHP) of cows differing in BCS. Twelve multiparous nonpregnant and nonlactating Jersey cows were randomly assigned to one of 2 treatment groups. To construct these groups, cows were fed 2 different TMR in a preexperimental period for 84 d resulting in a BCS of >5 (HiBCS) and a BCS <3 (LoBCS), and no difference was observed in initial BW or BCS between treatments, averaging 509 ± 26.0 kg and 4.1 ± 0.23. To begin the experiment all animals were fed at maintenance [NELmaint, (Mcal/d) = 0.10 × metabolic BW (BW0.75)] for 24 d followed by 4 d of data collection for energy balance, cows were then fasted of 96 h with data collection for energy balance once again taken over the final 24 h. During the maintenance collection period, differences in BW and BCS existed (439 and 566 ± 19.0 kg BW, and 3.0 and 5.0 ± 0.13 BCS) for LoBCS and HiBCS, respectively. Heat production increased with increasing BCS (13.1 to 16.2 ± 0.55 Mcal/d), but when expressed per unit of BW0.75 no difference was observed (0.14 ± 0.002 Mcal/d per BW0.75). When fasted, BW loss did not differ averaging 28.9 ± 0.181 kg. The FHP did not differ, averaging 0.10 ± 0.004 Mcal/d per BW0.75 and resulted in the following representation of maintenance: [NELmaint, (Mcal/d) = 0.10 ± 0.004 × BW0.75]. During fasting the nitrogen free respiratory quotient tended to differ (0.69 and 0.73 ± 0.014) and O2 consumption and CO2 production for protein oxidation differed for LoBCS and HiBCS (5.44 and 2.35 ± 0.988 O2 and 4.52 and 1.95 ± 0.821 CO2 L/BW0.75). Overall, FHP increased with increasing BCS, but FHP per unit of BW0.75 did not differ. Although BW change was similar during fasting, differences O2 consumption and CO2 production per unit of BW0.75 used for protein oxidation may indicate differences in the nature of body tissue utilization in cows differing in BCS.
More Related Videos
11:02The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
Published on: September 7, 2015
09:09Protocol for Assessing the Relative Effects of Environment and Genetics on Antler and Body Growth for a Long-lived Cervid
Published on: August 8, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Production Efficiency
Energy Budgets
Conservation of Mechanical Energy
When a...
Conservation of Energy: Application
Conservation of Energy
Trophic Efficiency