Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

11:19
Robotic Myotomy and Partial Fundoplication for Achalasia
Published on: August 11, 2023
1.5K
Implementation of Robot-assisted Urologic Surgeries Using Hugo RAS System in a High-volume Robotic "Da Vinci Xi"
Guilherme Miranda Andrade1, Clayton Lau2, Ruben Olivares3
1Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Urology
|June 30, 2024
Summary
The Hugo RAS system is safe for urological procedures when implemented by experienced surgeons and teams. While adaptations in positioning and ergonomics are needed, the system demonstrates feasibility and good patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Robotic-assisted surgery
- Urological surgery
- Surgical innovation
Background:
- The Hugo Robotic-Assisted Surgery (RAS) system represents a new platform for minimally invasive procedures.
- Evaluating the initial experience with novel robotic systems is crucial for understanding their clinical application and challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety, feasibility, and initial outcomes of the Hugo RAS platform in urological surgery.
- To describe trocar disposition, docking angles, surgical times, and functional results in the first 30 cases.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective, observational study of 30 consecutive urological surgeries using the Hugo RAS system.
- Evaluation of console and docking times, perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo), blood loss, and arm collisions.
- Assessment of urinary continence and sexual function for radical prostatectomies.
Main Results:
- Procedures included radical prostatectomy (RARP), simple prostatectomy (RASP), partial nephrectomy (RAPN), and cystectomy (RARC).
- Median console operative times ranged from 78-82 minutes; median docking times were 10-12 minutes.
- No major complications or significant blood loss (<200 mL) were reported; 94.5% of RARP patients regained sexual function.
Conclusions:
- Implementation of the Hugo RAS system in a urological program is safe and feasible for high-volume surgeons with a trained team.
- Adaptations in patient positioning, trocar placement, and bed assistant ergonomics are necessary.
- Docking position and bed assistant ergonomics present the primary challenges during system implementation.

