Cadiax Compact 2 and MODJAW comparative analysis of condylar inclination: Innovative digital approaches in dentistry

Artificial intelligence has been used to enhance the digitalized workflow, especially when undergoing complex oral rehabilitations. However, the reliability of real-time jaw motion registration devices is unclear, and no standard measurement method of the sagittal condylar inclination (SCI) and Bennett angle (BA) has been established.

The purpose of this clinical study was to compare and evaluate the reliability of the SCI and BA values recorded by using 2 different digital devices.

A total of 17 participants, aged between 20 and 30 years (10 women and 7 men) were included in the study. For each participant, the Cadiax Compact 2 and MODJAW tracking devices were used to measure the SCI and BA values at 3 mm and 5 mm of condylar displacement during 3 separate recording sessions. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the reliability of the recordings. Comparisons between the devices were performed with the Wilcoxson rank-sum test (α=.05). The Bland-Altman plot was used to evaluate the quantitative agreement between the 2 devices.

All ICC intrarater reliability values for Cadiax and MODJAW were higher than 0.90. Both at 3 and 5 mm, the SCI measurements were higher for MODJAW registrations than for those recorded by Cadiax. The Bland-Altman plot showed that the SCI values were higher for MODJAW than for Cadiax by 5.9 (95% CI 3.9 to 8.2) and that the BA differences between the MODJAW and the Cadiax were not consistent with the measured value.

Excellent reliability was found with the MODJAW and Cadiax recordings. The SCI and BA values for MODJAW measurements were higher at 3 mm and 5 mm than those acquired with Cadiax. MODJAW showed higher values than Cadiax, and the discrepancies were more pronounced for 3 mm than for 5 mm of condylar displacement, highlighting the need for precision in measurements at lower ranges of motion.