Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025
Isolation of Leukocytes from the Human Maternal-fetal Interface
Published on: May 21, 2015
[Comparison of two superparamagnetic purification magnetic beads-based screening and enrichment techniques for
Wen Zeng1, Jianjiang Zhu, Hong Qi
1Department of Prenatal Diagnosis, Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Haidian District, Beijing 100080, China. qihong_2009@sina.com.
Objective:
To assess the efficiency of modified enrichment method for cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) through purified superparamagnetic beads during non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).
Methods:
A total of 26 252 pregnant women undergoing NIPT at the Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Haidian District from December 2017 to September 2022 were recruited and randomly assigned into the conventional group (n = 10 573) and the modified enrichment group (n = 15 679), who were then subjected to the screening and enrichment of the cffDNA using a conventional and a modified technique, respectively. High-risk pregnant women detected by NIPT were subjected to invasive prenatal diagnosis. All women were followed up for their pregnancy outcomes, and the detection efficacy of the two methods was compared in terms of fragment size, concentration of cffDNA, duplicate detection rate, and indices of clinical laboratory tests.
Results:
The fragment size of the main peak of the cell-free DNA library of the modified enrichment group was significantly lower than that of the conventional group [267 (264, 269) bp vs. 294 (292, 296) bp, P < 0.01], while the concentration of cffDNA was significantly higher [21.86% (17.61%, 26.36%) vs. 9.08% (6.87%, 11.87%), P < 0.01]. In addition, the duplicate detection rate (0.740% vs. 2.02%, X2 = 83.90, P < 0.01) and detection failure rate (0.006% vs. 0.057%, P < 0.05) in the modified enrichment group were significantly lower than those of the conventional group. The combined positive predictive value (PPV) in both high-risk (64.3% vs. 76.1%) and low-risk (35.3% vs. 45.5%) pregnant women from the modified enrichment group was slightly lower than those from the conventional group, though no significant difference was detected. There was one false negative case for trisomy 21 among the high-risk pregnant women from the conventional group, and no false negative case was found in the modified enrichment group.
Conclusion:
The modified technique to screen and enrich the cffDNA has significantly enhanced the relative concentration of cffDNA and reduced the failure and duplication detection rate of NIPT, which has significantly reduced the incidence of false negative cases due to the low concentration of cffDNA, and greatly increased the overall detection efficacy of NIPT.
