Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of an Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Model
Published on: April 18, 2015
Probabilistic Nested Model Selection in Pharmacokinetic Analysis of DCE-MRI Data in Animal Model of Cerebral Tumor
Hassan Bagher-Ebadian1,2,3,4, Stephen L Brown1,2,4, Mohammad M Ghassemi5
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, USA.
Purpose:
Best current practice in the analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI is to employ a voxel-by-voxel model selection from a hierarchy of nested models. This nested model selection (NMS) assumes that the observed time-trace of contrast-agent (CA) concentration within a voxel, corresponds to a singular physiologically nested model. However, admixtures of different models may exist within a voxel's CA time-trace. This study introduces an unsupervised feature engineering technique (Kohonen-Self-Organizing-Map (K-SOM)) to estimate the voxel-wise probability of each nested model.
Methods:
Sixty-six immune-compromised-RNU rats were implanted with human U-251N cancer cells, and DCE-MRI data were acquired from all the rat brains. The time-trace of change in the longitudinalrelaxivity for all animals' brain voxels was calculated. DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed using NMS to estimate three model regions: Model-1: normal vasculature without leakage, Model-2: tumor tissues with leakage without back-flux to the vasculature, Model-3: tumor vessels with leakage and back-flux. Approximately two hundred thirty thousand (229,314) normalized profiles of animals' brain voxels along with their NMS results were used to build a K-SOM (topology-size: 8×8, with competitive-learning algorithm) and probability map of each model. K-fold nested-cross-validation (NCV, k=10) was used to evaluate the performance of the K-SOM probabilistic-NMS (PNMS) technique against the NMS technique.
Results:
The K-SOM PNMS's estimation for the leaky tumor regions were strongly similar (Dice-Similarity-Coefficient, DSC=0.774 [CI: 0.731-0.823], and 0.866 [CI: 0.828-0.912] for Models 2 and 3, respectively) to their respective NMS regions. The mean-percent-differences (MPDs, NCV, k=10) for the estimated permeability parameters by the two techniques were: -28%, +18%, and +24%, for , and , respectively. The KSOM-PNMS technique produced microvasculature parameters and NMS regions less impacted by the arterial-input-function dispersion effect.
Conclusion:
This study introduces an unsupervised model-averaging technique (K-SOM) to estimate the contribution of different nested-models in PK analysis and provides a faster estimate of permeability parameters.
Related Concept Videos
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models
Two primary types of compartment models are recognized: mammillary and catenary. The more...
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.

